similar to: error when using vcovHC()

Dear all, how can I use vcovHC() to get robust/corrected standard errors from an arima() output? I ran an arima model with AR(1) and got the estimate, se, zvalue and p-value using coeftest(arima.output). However, I cannot use vcovHC(arima.output) to get corrected standard errors. It seems vcovHC works only with lm and plm objects? Is there another way I can get robust/corrected

First I have to say I am sorry because I have not been so clear in my previous e-mails. I will try to explain clearer what it is my problem. I have the following model: lnP=Sc+Ag+Ag2+Var+R+D In this model the variable Sc is endogenous and the rest are all objective exogenous variables. I verified that Sc is endogenous through a standard Hausman test. To determine this I defined before a new

I am trying to build a package (GWASTools, submitted to Bioconductor) that uses the "sandwich" package. I have references to "sandwich" in DESCRIPTION: Imports: methods, DBI, RSQLite, sandwich, survival, DNAcopy and NAMESPACE: import(sandwich) In the code itself is a call to vcovHC: Vhat <- vcovHC(mod, type="HC0") I have sandwich version 2.2-7 installed.

Hey I am trying to run /coeftest()/ using a heteroskedasticity-consistent estimation of the covariance matrix and i get this error: # packages >library(lmtest) >library(sandwich) #test > coeftest(*GSm_inc.pool*, vcov = vcovHC(*GSm_inc.pool*, method="arellano", > type="HC3")) /Fehler in 1 - diaghat : nicht-numerisches Argument f?r bin?ren Operator/ something like:

Hello again Max. A correction to my response from yesterday. Things were better than they seemed. I thought it over, checked Arellano's panel book and Driscoll and Kraay (Rev. Econ. Stud. 1998) and finally realized that vcovSCC does what you want: in fact, despite being born primarily for dealing with cross-sectional correlation, 'SCC' standard errors are robust to "both

Ted Harding said: > I can get the estimated RRs from > RRs <- exp(summary(GLM)$coef[,1]) > but do not see how to implement confidence intervals based > on "robust error variances" using the output in GLM. Thanks for the link to the data. Here's my best guess. If you use the following approach, with the HC0 type of robust standard errors in the

On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Peter Muhlberger wrote: One comment in advance: please use a more meaningful subject. I would have missed this mail if a colleague hadn't pointed me to it. > I'm someone who from time to time comes to R to do applied stats for social > science research. [snip] > I would also prefer not to have to work through a > couple books on R or S+ to learn how to

I'm trying to replicate a time-series cross-sectional analysis (countries over years) with SEs clustered by country. ?The original analysis was done in Stata 10 with: xtreg [DV] [IVs] fe cluster(country). Using plm() in R (cran.r-project.org/web/packages/plm/index.html), I've replicated the coefficients. I sought to estimate country-clustered SEs with vcovHC(), and tried a variety of

Hi, I am trying to obtain the heteroskedasticity consitent standard errors (HCSE) after apply 2SLS. I obtain 2SLS through tsls from package sem or systemfit: #### tsls #### library (sem) Reg2SLS <-tsls(LnP~Sc+Ag+Ag2+Var+R+D,~I2+Ag+Ag2+Var+R+D) summary (Reg2SLS) #### systemfit #### library (systemfit) RS <- LnP~Sc+Ag+Ag2+Var+R+D Inst <- ~I2+Ag+Ag2+Var+R+D labels

Hi, I am relatively new to R; when creating functions, I run into problems with missing values. I would like my functions to ignore rows with missing values for arguments of my function) in the analysis (as for example is the case in STATA). Note that I don't want my function to drop rows if there are missing arguments elsewhere in a row, ie for variables that are not arguments of my

Dear useRs, The package vars, implementing multivariate time series models VAR and VECM, has been updated to version 1.4.7 The new changes are: -the compatibility with the sandwich/lmtest package, which allows to use heteroskedasticity consistent (HC) covariance estimators, to do inference on the parameters taking into account heteroskedasticity of unknown form. -Implementation of a

Dear useRs, The package vars, implementing multivariate time series models VAR and VECM, has been updated to version 1.4.7 The new changes are: -the compatibility with the sandwich/lmtest package, which allows to use heteroskedasticity consistent (HC) covariance estimators, to do inference on the parameters taking into account heteroskedasticity of unknown form. -Implementation of a

Dear R users, I have a question here library(AER) library(plm) library(sandwich) ## take the following data data("Gasoline", package="plm") Gasoline$f.year=as.factor(Gasoline$year) Now I run the following regression rhs <- "-1 + f.year + lincomep+lrpmg+lcarpcap" m1<- lm(as.formula(paste("lgaspcar ~", rhs)), data=Gasoline) ###Now I want to find the

Hi, I would like to estimate coefficients using poisson regression and then get standard errors that are adjusted for heteroskedasticity, using a complex sample survey data. Then I will calculate prevalence ratio and confidence intervals. Can sandwich estimator of variance be used when observations aren?t independent? In my case, observations are independent across groups (clusters), but

When using function heckit() from package ‘sampleSelection’, is there anyway to make t-tests for the coefficients using robust covariance matrix estimator? By “robust” I mean something like if a had an object ‘lm’ called “reg” and then used: > coeftest(reg, vcov = vcovHC(reg)). I’m asking this because in Stata we could use function heckman and then use vce option “robust”. We could do the

Guillermo, I am dropping most of your mail because my answer is very generic. First, why doesn't it work as you tried it: technically speaking, coeftest() and the like expect to be feed an lm or a glm object and for this reason won't accept the result of systemfit(), which is a much different object. I suppose the same goes for the rest. Second, what can you do: I'd do at least one

Hi, I would like to estimate a panel model (small N large T, fixed effects), but would need "robust" standard errors for that. In particular, I am worried about potential serial correlation for a given individual (not so much about correlation in the cross section). >From the documentation, it looks as if the vcovHC that comes with plm does not seem to do autocorrelation, and the

In the rockchalk package, I want to provide functions for regression objects that are "well behaved." If an object responds to the methods that lm or glm objects can handle, like coef(), nobs(), and summary(), I want to be able to handle the same thing. It is more difficult than expected to ask a given fitted model object "do you respond to these functions: coef(), nobs(),

> On Mar 31, 2016, at 1:00 PM, Paul Johnson <pauljohn32 at gmail.com> wrote: > > In the rockchalk package, I want to provide functions for regression > objects that are "well behaved." If an object responds to the methods > that lm or glm objects can handle, like coef(), nobs(), and summary(), > I want to be able to handle the same thing. > > It is more

Hi all, Within a foreach loop with doSNOW, we cant call functions which come from the non-default package. We need to load(require/library) the package once more within the foreach loop. Anyone knows why would happen like this? Is it caused by the snow package and something happened when "snow" parallelize the job? Other than load the package once more with in the foreach loop, is