similar to: Survreg/psm output

I am using psm to model some parametric survival data, the data is for length of stay in an emergency department. There are several ways a patient's stay in the emergency department can end (discharge, admit, etc..) so I am looking at modeling the effects of several covariates on the various outcomes. Initially I am trying to fit a survival model for each type of outcome using the psm

Hi to all, I am working on design package using survival function. First using PSM and adopting a weibull specification for the baseline hazard , I have got the following results(since weibull has both PH and AFT propreties ,in addition I have used the PPHSm command): Value Std. Error z p (Intercept) 1.768 1.0007 1.77 7.73e-02 SIZE -0.707 0.0895 -7.90 2.80e-15

Dear R users, Please can you help me with a relatively straightforward problem that I am struggling with? I am simply trying to plot a baseline survivor and hazard function for a simple data set of lung cancer survival where `futime' is follow up time in months and status is 1=dead and 0=alive. Using the survival package: lung.wbs <- survreg( Surv(futime, status)~ 1, data=lung,

1. The weibull is the only distribution that can be written in both a proportional hazazrds for and an accelerated failure time form. Survreg uses the latter. In an ACF model, we model the time to failure. Positive coefficients are good (longer time to death). In a PH model, we model the death rate. Positive coefficients are bad (higher death rate). You are not the first to be confused

Full_Name: Oleg Raisky Version: 1.8.1 OS: Windows 2000 Submission from: (NULL) (63.246.203.107) This is a completely fresh R install. I'm trying to use Design package. Every time I run the first example for psm() I'm getting an error <<couldn't find function "survreg.fit">>. However, survreg.fit does exists in the search path. Is there something I can do to fix

Hello I would like to compare the results obtained with a classical non parametric proportionnal hazard model with a parametric proportionnal hazard model using a Weibull. How can we obtain the equivalence of the parameters using coxph(non parametric model) and survreg(parametric model) ? Thanks Virginie

Dear all, I am trying to find a suitable R-function for parametric proportional hazard regressions. The package survival contains the coxph() function which performs a Cox regression which leaves the base hazard unspecified, i.e. it is a semi-parametric method. The package Design contains the function pphsm() which is good for parametric proportional hazard regressions when the underlying base

Thanks for sharing the questions and responses! Is it possible to appreciate how much the coefficients matter in one or the other model? Say, using Biau's example, using coxph, as.factor(grade2 == "high")TRUE gives hazard ratio 1.27 (rounded). As clinician I can grasp this HR as 27% relative increase. I can relate with other published results. With survreg the Weibull model gives a

Dear R help list, I am modeling some survival data with coxph and survreg (dist='weibull') using package survival. I have 2 problems: 1) I do not understand how to interpret the regression coefficients in the survreg output and it is not clear, for me, from ?survreg.objects how to. Here is an example of the codes that points out my problem: - data is stc1 - the factor is dichotomous

Does Surv in psm handle interval2 data? The argument list seems to indicate it does but I get an error. Thanks, Chris # code library('survival') left <- c(1, 3, 5, NA) right <-c(2, 3, NA, 4) Surv(left, right, type='interval2') survreg(Surv(left, right, type='interval2') ~ 1) library('rms') Surv(left, right, type='interval2') # error args(Surv)

Dear r-help subscribers, A couple of weeks ago I sent the following message to the r-help mail list. It hasn't generated any response, and I could really use some help on this. Anyone able to help? Thanks again, Roger Dungan >> I am working on some survival analysis of some interval censored failure time data in R. I have done similar analysis before using PROC LIFEREG in SAS. In

Dear R help forum, I am using the function 'coxph' to obtain hazard ratios for the comparison of a standard treatment to new treatments. This is easily obtained by fitting the relevant model and then calling exp(coef(fit1)) say. I now want to obtain the hazard ratio for the comparison of two non-standard treatments. >From a statistical point of view, this can be achieved by dividing

I am trying to use R to do loglogistic hazard estimation. My plan is to generate a loglogistic hazard sample data and then use survreg to estimate it. If everything is correct, survreg should return the parameters I have used to generate the sample data. I have written the following code to do a time invariant hazard estimation. The output of summary(modloglog) shows the factor loading of

Dear R-Help, I am using the 'mfp' package. It produces three plots (as I am using the Cox model) simultaneously which can be viewed together using the following code: fit <- mfp(Surv(rem.Remtime,rem.Rcens)~fp(age)+strata(rpa),family=cox,data=nearma,select=0.05,verbose=TRUE) par(mfrow=c(2,2)) plot(fit) They can be viewed separately but the return key must be pressed after each graph

Hi all, I am trying to run Weibull PH model in R. Assume in the data set I have x1 a continuous variable and x2 a categorical variable with two classes (0= sick and 1= healthy). I fit the model in the following way. Test=survreg(Surv(time,cens)~ x1+x2,dist="weibull") My questions are 1. Is it Weibull PH model or Weibull AFT model? Call: survreg(formula = Surv(time, delta) ~ x1

Hi All, This sounds a relatively simple query, and I hope it is! I am looking at a continuous variable, age. I am looking at time to 12-month remission and can calculate the HR and 95% confidence interval are follows: coxfita = coxph(Surv(rem.Remtime,rem.Rcens)~nearma$all.age,data=nearma) exp(coxfita$coefficients) exp(confint(coxfita)) However, because I am looking at age as a continuous

Dear all, I am using Windows and R 2.9.2 for my analyses. I have a large dataset and I am particularly interested in looking at time to an event for a continuous variable. I would like to produce a plot of log(relative risk) or relative risk (also known as hazard ratio) against the continuous variable. I have spent a long time looking for advice on how to do this but my search has proved

Dear R-help, I am trying to obtain the baseline survival estimate of a fitted Cox model (S_0 (t)). I know that previous posts have said use 'basehaz' but this gives the baseline hazard function and not the baseline survival estimate. Is there a way to obtain the baseline survival estimate or do I have to use the formula which does something like S(t) = exp[- the integral from 0 to t of

Dear All, I would like to fit some parametric survival models using left truncated, right censored data in R. However I am having problems finding a function to fit parametric survival models which can handle left truncated data. I have tested both the survreg function in package survival: fit1 <- survreg(Surv(start, stop, status) ~ X + Y + Z, data=data1) and the psm function in package

While sm4.6ll<-fit.mult.impute(Surv(agesi, si)~partner+ in.love+ pubty+ FPA+ strat(gender),fitter = cph, xtrans = dated.sexrisk2.i, data = dated.sexrisk2, x=T,y=T,surv=T, time.inc=16) runs perfectly using Hmisc, Design and mice under R11 run via Sciviews-K, with library(Design) library(mice) ds2d<-datadist(dated.sexrisk2) options(datadist="ds2d")