similar to: AICs from lmer different with summary and anova

# Hi there, # I am trying to apply a function over a moving-window for a large number of multivariate time-series that are grouped in a nested set of factors. I have spent a few days searching for solutions with no luck, so any suggestions are much appreciated. # The data I have are for the abundance dynamics of multiple species observed in multiple fixed plots at multiple sites. (I total I

Hi, I wonder whether the mechanism of parsing parameters to functions has changed between 0.63.1 and 0.63.3? The following code yeils different results in R 0.63.1 (Version 0.63.1 (Dec 5, 1998)) and R 0.63.3. cave<-function(x,a,b) { return(c(mean(x[a],na.rm=T),mean(x[b],na.rm=T))) } datx <- data.frame(rbind(c(1,2,3,4),c(4,5,6,7)))

Hi, I wonder whether the mechanism of parsing parameters to functions has changed between 0.63.1 and 0.63.3? The following code yeils different results in R 0.63.1 (Version 0.63.1 (Dec 5, 1998)) and R 0.63.3. cave<-function(x,a,b) { return(c(mean(x[a],na.rm=T),mean(x[b],na.rm=T))) } datx <- data.frame(rbind(c(1,2,3,4),c(4,5,6,7)))

Hello dear R help members. I am trying to understand the anova.rq, and I am finding something which I can not explain (is it a bug?!): The example is for when we have 3 nested models. I run the anova once on the two models, and again on the three models. I expect that the p.value for the comparison of model 1 and model 2 would remain the same, whether or not I add a third model to be compared

Dear R developers, I noticed a bug in the stats4 package, specifically in the confint method applied to ?mle? objects. In particular, when some ?fixed? parameters define the log likelihood, these parameters are stored within the mle object but they are not used by the ?confint" method, which retrieves their value from the global environment (whenever they still exist). Sample code: >

I am trying to find methods for testing and visualizing calibration to Cox models with time-depended coefficients. I have read this nice article <http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0962280213497434>. In this paper, we can fit three models: fit0 <- coxph(Surv(futime, status) ~ x1 + x2 + x3, data = data0) p <- log(predict(fit0, newdata = data1, type = "expected")) lp

Hi , I want to apply the following code fo my data with 400 predictors. I was wondering if there ia an alternative way instead of typing 400 predictors for the following code. I really appreciate your help. fit0<-lm(Y~1, data= mydata) fit.final<- lm(Y~X1+X2+X3+.....+X400, data=mydata) ??? step(fit0, scope=list(lower=fit0, upper=fit.final), data=mydata, direction="forward")

First, as others have said please obey the mailing list rules and turn of First, as others have said please obey the mailing list rules and turn off html, not everyone uses an html email client. Here is your code, formatted and with line numbers added. I also fixed one error: "y" should be "status". 1. fit0 <- coxph(Surv(futime, status) ~ x1 + x2 + x3, data = data0) 2. p

windows xp R 2.8.1 I am trying to plot the -log(log(survival)) to visually test the proportional hazards assumption of a Cox regression. The plot, which should give two lines (one for each treatment) gives only one line and a warning message. I would appreciate help getting two lines, and an explanation of the warning message. My problem may the that I have very few events in one of my strata,

R 2.8.1 Windows XP I am trying to plot the results of a coxph using plot(survfit()). The plot should, I believe, show two lines one for survival in each of two treatment (Drug) groups, however my plot shows only one line. What am I doing wrong? My code is reproduced below, my figure is attached to this EMail message. John > #Create simple survival object >

Here is an example, modified from the help page to use test="Cp": -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > fit0 <- lm(sr ~ 1, data = LifeCycleSavings) > fit1 <- update(fit0, . ~ . + pop15) > fit2 <- update(fit1, . ~ . + pop75) > anova(fit0, fit1, fit2, test="Cp") Error in `[.data.frame`(table, , "Resid.

Hello, All: ????? The default "simulate" method for lm and glm seems to ignore the sampling variance of the parameter estimates;? see the trivial lm and glm examples below.? Both these examples estimate a mean with formula = x~1.? In both cases, the variance of the estimated mean is 1. ??? ??????? * In the lm example with x0 = c(-1, 1), var(x0) = 2, and

Folks: I'm having trouble doing a forward variable selection using step() First, I fit an initial model: fit0 <- glm ( est~1 , data=all, subset=c(n>=25) ) then I invoke step(): fit1 <- step( fit0 , scope=list(upper=est~ pcped + pchosp + pfarm ,lower=est~1)) I get the error message: Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : invalid 'envir' argument I looked at the

I'm trying to use mars{mda} to model functions that look fairly close to a sequence of straight line segments. Unfortunately, 'mars' seems to totally miss the obvious places for the knots in the apparent first order spline model, and I wonder if someone can suggest a better way to do this. The following example consists of a slight downward trend followed by a jump up after

Dear List, After including cluster() option the coxreg (from eha package) produces results slightly different than that of coxph (from survival) in the following time-dependent treatment effect calculation (example is used just to make the point). Will appreciate any explaination / comment. cheers, Ehsan ############################ require(survival) require(eha) data(heart) # create weights

Dear r-helpers, Spencer Graves and Manual Morales proposed the following methods to simulate p-values in lme4: ************preliminary************ require(lme4) require(MASS) summary(glm(y ~ lbase*trt + lage + V4, family = poisson, data = epil), cor = FALSE) epil2 <- epil[epil$period == 1, ] epil2["period"] <- rep(0, 59); epil2["y"] <- epil2["base"]

Hi everybody, I'm using the method described here to make a linear regression: http://www.apsnet.org/education/advancedplantpath/topics/Rmodules/Doc1/05_Nonlinear_regression.html > ## Input the data that include the variables time, plant ID, and severity > time <- c(seq(0,10),seq(0,10),seq(0,10)) > plant <- c(rep(1,11),rep(2,11),rep(3,11)) > > ## Severity

On 2019-12-27 04:34, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > On 26/12/2019 11:14 p.m., Spencer Graves wrote: >> Hello, All: >> >> >> ? ????? The default "simulate" method for lm and glm seems to ignore the >> sampling variance of the parameter estimates;? see the trivial lm and >> glm examples below.? Both these examples estimate a mean with formula = >>

Hi everyone! I am using the mle {stats4} to estimate the parameters of distributions by MLE method. I have a problem with the examples they provided with the mle{stats4} html files. Please check the example and my question below! *Here is the mle html help file * http://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-devel/library/stats4/html/mle.html http://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-devel/library/stats4/html/mle.html

Dear all, I've replicated the cheese tasting example on p175 of GLM's by McCullagh and Nelder. This is a 4 treatment (rows) by 9 ordinal response (cols) table. Here's my simple code: #### cheese library(MASS) options(contrasts = c("contr.treatment", "contr.poly")) y = c(0,0, 1, 7, 8,8,19, 8,1, 6,9,12,11, 7,6, 1, 0,0, 1,1, 6, 8,23,7,