similar to: Labeling points on plot on relative warp scores?

Tuomo Soini wrote: > You don''t happen to read shorewall-devel mailinglist ? I read it -- I just didn''t know what to make of your post and it arrived while I was on vacation. What exactly are you trying to accomplish that Shorewall isn''t doing for you now? e.g. /etc/shorewall/zones rw Roadwarriors Road Warriors /etc/shorewall/interfraces rw ipsec+

The version of Shorewall in the CVS development tree contains the first implementation of dynamic zones. While these zones are aimed at IPSEC Road Warriors, there is nothing ipsec-specific in the implementation except for a small extension in the tunnels file. There are two new commands: add and delete shorewall {add|delete} <interface>[:<host or subnet>] zone The interface

Change the assembly code to use only relative references of symbols for the kernel to be PIE compatible. Position Independent Executable (PIE) support will allow to extended the KASLR randomization range below the -2G memory limit. Signed-off-by: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie at google.com> --- arch/x86/crypto/aes-x86_64-asm_64.S | 45 ++++++++----- arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_asm.S

Hello, I have two rows which are almost identical but miss different values at different locations. I would like to merge these two rows so that the missing values are replaced by the element in the same column on the other row making one row. If both rows contain a NA, NA remains in the output. 1 2 3 4 5 Row1 AA AG GG NA NA Row2 NA AG GG AA NA The

I'm trying to build and install Samba 3.0.30 on a Solaris 9 SPARC machine. When I do a "make test", the RW1 test is failing. If I go back and configure and build 3.0.28 with the same settings, and do a make test, everything passes. Here's what I'm seeing with 3.0.30: ---8<--- Testing RW1 (0) TEST OUTPUT: host=127.0.0.2 share=tmp user=root myname=cannes Running RW1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 If I use the smbtorture available at ftp://ftp.samba.org/pub/tridge/dbench, I get the following options: tests are: FDPASS LOCK1 LOCK2 LOCK3 UNLINK BROWSE ATTR TRANS2 MAXFID TORTURE RANDOMIPC NBW95 NBWNT default test is ALL But the smbtorture compiled with Gentoo's 3.0.2a gives me tests are: FDPASS LOCK1 LOCK2 LOCK3 LOCK4 LOCK5 LOCK6 LOCK7

Dear R People: I would like to generate a vector/variable name from within a loop to be passed to a table function. This is what I have so far: >assign("p1",paste("raw3.df$",rw2$V1[3],sep="")) >p1 [1] "raw3.df$CITIZEN" > Essentially, I want to use the raw3.df$CITIZEN along with another value to generate a table. However, I'm stuck here. I

I can run OS/2 Warp 4 (no fixpak) as guest in native QEMU (non kqemu). I can also run OS/2 Warp 4 in a domu guest in XEN 3.1 on a Ubuntu 7.04 (Feisty) host. A stripped down eComStation will also work in native QEMU but it will not run in XEN 3.1. When trying to run eComStation in XEN, at boot it will lockup immediately (at boot blob). Any ideas or fixes that might help? thanks

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107829 Bug ID: 107829 Summary: nouveau crash/freeze [MULTIPLE_WARP_ERRORS] warp 3f0009 [ILLEGAL_INSTR_ENCODING] Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: major Priority:

Is anyone running Warp Clients out there. I am having some problems with saving files and such as was wondering if anyone could send me a smb.conf that is configured with OS/2 in mind. I have the Samba server running on AIX and have had great success with Window 95, 98 and NT clients but seem mystified by the OS/2 problems. I'm sure if I could look at a conf file I could piece my installation

Dear all: Subjects were measured two times (t1 and t2) on different variables (v1 ... vn). Between t1 and t2 there was an experimental manipulation. I computed two PCAs for time-points t1 and t2. Is it possible to combine both PCAs in order to get only one set of eigenvectors? Due to the experimental manipulation measurement values on time points t1 and t2 changed for each subject. Many

Dear list, here is an example of stepAIC that I do not understand. The data is n=42, Lage is the only factor and there are four other variables treated as continuous. First you see the stepAIC-forward solution (fs7). The strange thing here is that apparently not all interactions are tried for inclusion, but only WQ:Lage. In particular, I think that WFL:Lage should be tried in the last two

Sometime not too long ago, I installed a new security release of samba on my debian box. Shortly after, I realized that my OS/2 Warp 4 box was no longer able to access the shares on my debian box. The OS/2 system is still able to access shares on other (Win9x) machines. I asked around about this issue on an OS/2 list. Although no one there was sure what might have caused it to quit working,

Hello, I've recently come across an error reported by the GPU and would like to know what it means and especially what causes it to be triggered. Any information would be very useful: I'm seeing MP warp error 0x10 (appears in MP register 0x48). This is what we currently have in nouveau: <reg32 offset="0x048" name="TRAP_WARP_ERROR"> <!-- ctx-switched -->

Changes: - patch v2: - Adapt patch to work post KPTI and compiler changes - Redo all performance testing with latest configs and compilers - Simplify mov macro on PIE (MOVABS now) - Reduce GOT footprint - patch v1: - Simplify ftrace implementation. - Use gcc mstack-protector-guard-reg=%gs with PIE when possible. - rfc v3: - Use --emit-relocs instead of -pie to reduce

Changes: - patch v2: - Adapt patch to work post KPTI and compiler changes - Redo all performance testing with latest configs and compilers - Simplify mov macro on PIE (MOVABS now) - Reduce GOT footprint - patch v1: - Simplify ftrace implementation. - Use gcc mstack-protector-guard-reg=%gs with PIE when possible. - rfc v3: - Use --emit-relocs instead of -pie to reduce

I run Samba 2.2.2 on any of there vendors/osversions/filesystems: o Solaris 8 / ufs o Tru64 Unix V5.0A / advfs o RedHat 7.1 / Kernel 2.4.2 / ext2fs all these are capable of handling large files (files with a 64-bit-offset larger than 4GB). At configure time, samba selects the proper compile flags (-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE, -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64) for use with large files. The problem: When I

These patches make the changes necessary to build the kernel as Position Independent Executable (PIE) on x86_64. A PIE kernel can be relocated below the top 2G of the virtual address space. It allows to optionally extend the KASLR randomization range from 1G to 3G. Thanks a lot to Ard Biesheuvel & Kees Cook on their feedback on compiler changes, PIE support and KASLR in general. Thanks to

These patches make the changes necessary to build the kernel as Position Independent Executable (PIE) on x86_64. A PIE kernel can be relocated below the top 2G of the virtual address space. It allows to optionally extend the KASLR randomization range from 1G to 3G. Thanks a lot to Ard Biesheuvel & Kees Cook on their feedback on compiler changes, PIE support and KASLR in general. Thanks to

Changes: - patch v3: - Update on message to describe longer term PIE goal. - Minor change on ftrace if condition. - Changed code using xchgq. - patch v2: - Adapt patch to work post KPTI and compiler changes - Redo all performance testing with latest configs and compilers - Simplify mov macro on PIE (MOVABS now) - Reduce GOT footprint - patch v1: - Simplify ftrace