similar to: List assignment in a while loop and timing

Hello, During a .Call e.g while(TRUE){ value <-rhsqnextKVR(rdr) ## has .Call in this function if(is.null(value)) break; } if I press CTRL-C, R exits straight to the command line. Q: How can I prevent this? I should point out that my library uses JNI, so I'm not sure if that is causing it. I'm using R-2.8 on Linux (RHEL 5) Thank you in advance Regards Saptarshi

Hi All, I have an asterisk box on my DMZ, and I'm using a PF for my firewall, I can make a call but some reasons I have a dead air. Any Ideas? below are my rules... ext_if = "bce0" int_if = "bce1" altitude = "172.16.1.0/24" #### machines #### vbox = "172.16.1.1" uci = "172.16.1.4" voices = "203.172.x.1" ipc =

Hello, I've been using samba to share files on a Redhat server within a windows NT domain. Recently, security policies in the domain have changed, and security signatures are required for the LanManServer and Rdr services. Now that this has been deployed, I get an error when I try to connect to the SMB shares on the Redhat server from Windows hosts saying "account is not authorized to log

Hi. I am running SAMBA 2.0.7 on HP-UX 11.00 and HP-UX 10.20. I have tried adding the MultipleUsersOnConnection registry key onto my Microsoft Windows NT Server 4 Terminal Server Edition servers, running with Service Pack 6. After I make this change in the registry and reboot my WTS servers all my samba connections from the servers are still being made with one process instead of being split

Dear All, We are seeing the following warning messages in event logs on PCs that are accessing a Samba server (Solaris 2.7, samba 2.0.6):- 03/03/04/2001,14:44:04,Rdr,Warning,None,3025,N/A,CIS-C033-04,A write-behind operation has failed to the remote server ilex. The data contains the amount requested to write and the amount actually written. What does this message actually mean? Does it

I'm trying to use pf + ftp-proxy n a 6.1-PRERELEASE machine. I have this line on inetd.conf: ftp-proxy stream tcp nowait root /usr/libexec/ftp-proxy ftp-proxy -n And this lines on pf.conf: rdr on $int_if proto tcp from any to any port ftp -> 127.0.0.1 port ftp-proxy pass in quick on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any port ftp-data to $ext_if:0 user proxy flags S/SA keep

does anyone what is the ipfw equivalent line for this one? rdr fxp0 external_ip_addres/32 port 69 -> 192.168.66.3 port 69 udp i use a tftpd server behind a nat and i want to redirect all trafic coming from internet on port 69 to the tftpd server 10x for help __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around

PB with NT 5.0 Beta 1 Cant Find Services/Rdr il registry ... So can't put Enable Plain Text Password=1 Could someone help me ??? -- Eric Murat Tel : +33.1.34.30.50.27 Email : E.Murat@sagem.fr Fax : +33.1.34.30.50.17 SAGEM Eragny Avenue du Gros Chene 95612 Cergy Pontoise Cedex FRANCE

Hi, I'm playing around with gamlss and don't entirely understand the sigma result from an attempted lognormal fit. In the example below, I've created lognormal data with mu=10 and sigma=2. When I try a gamlss fit, I get an estimated mu=9.947 and sigma=0.69 The mu estimate seems in the ballpark, but sigma is very low. I get similar results on repeated trials and with Normal and

I'm writing because I had a problem with Samba, while installing it on some of our computers with Windows 98 (beta 3). We have an internal network not accessible from the outside, in which we use the sending in the clear (I.E. not encrypted) of the access passwords to Samba running on a Sun machine with Unix Solaris OS. We use unencrypted passwords because Windows 95 doesn't support

Hi, I'm a bit puzzled by the gamlss fitting of exponential and lognormal data. Gamlss seems to think that exponentially distributed data fits better with a lognormal distribution, and vice versa. For example, X <- rexp(1000) Gexp <- gamlss(X~1,family=EXP) # X~1 is X tilde 1 GAMLSS-RS iteration 1: Global Deviance = 2037.825 GAMLSS-RS iteration 2: Global Deviance = 2037.825 Glno

I'm running NT 4.0 Terminal Server (Service Pack 4) with Citrix MetaFrame 1.8 on a PC, and Samba 2.0.3 on an HP-UX box. We've been having occasional problems with files not saving correctly, and also with files not unzipping or copying correctly. I suspect it's some sort of incompatibility between Samba and Terminal Server/Metaframe and/or SP4. For

Does anyone Know the procedure for Windows 2000 workstation, in order to not encrypt passwords. What I needed is something similar to the transcription I make below that works for windows nt4 and 98. Thank's Emanuel Duarte (Portugal) ********************************** This should take care of the "clear text password" problemsyou've encountered: For Win 98 (To enable

I've got a server running FreeBSD 6.2 and PF. The server has a couple dozen jails on it. Previously, I had a few "private" services such as MySQL running on loopback IPs (127.0.0.2+) and the rest of the jails running on the public IPs. I have to renumber my machine with a new block of public IPs so I thought I'd be clever and move all the jails onto loopback IPs. Then

current setup SIP phone 192.168.1.30 --> linksys wrt54g sveasoft -- INTERNET -- (xl0) Firewall (xl2:172.16.0.50)--> (em1:172.16.0.101) Asterisk problem is RTP stream not oging trouhg from * to sip and vice versa. #1 and asterusk is pushing 192.168.1.30 back to linksys with 172 as return address.... or #2 asterisk trying to get back to me as 192.168 on public internet.. got

Hallo Liste Derzeit mache ich meine ersten Gehversuche mit Linux (SuSE). Bis jetzt habe ich in einem kleinen Netzwerk f?r meine Tauchschule vier Rechner betreut. Einer davon war WinNT-4.0 Server und Arbeitsplatz zugleich. Nachdem ich nicht mehr bereit bin, mich mit dem w?chentlichen "blue screen" und dem monatlichen Neuinstallieren von NT abzufinden, bin ich derzeit beim Umsteigen auf

Hello, I'm new to this list. The NT folk here, are concerned about some timeout errors and stuff that appear in their event viewer. They are building a case to convince management that unless these "samba" errors are fixed, we should move to NT file shares. I think this is a bad idea. Can anyone help me out here. We are running samba 2.0.6 (1st msg) and 2.0.5a (2nd err msg)

Hello, I'd be very grateful if anyone could share their ideas on this problem. The situation is this: I have a Solaris 8 machine running Samba 2.2.1a. The global configuration has "security = USER" and originally had "encrypt passwords = NO". I was able to map drives to shares on this machine from my WinNT 4 SP 5 workstation when I set the registry key advised by the

Dear all, I recently upgraded to Samba 2.0.3 and read the doc files about NT machines because I cannot connect to the Samba server. In the WinNT.txt file there is the following proposal: [ --- Start of pasted text --- ] The following registry entry change will re-enable clear text password handling: Run regedt32.exe and locate the hive key entry:

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1295 Summary: [PATCH] Transparent proxy support on Linux Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.6p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy: