similar to: constrOptim workaround for "L-BFGS-B" or Box Constraints

Hi, i need to minimize a quadratic function with boundary condidtions and one equality condition. In order to do that i converted the equality constraint into 2 inequality constaints and passed everything cia constrOptim, as the manual said: everything included in the ... will be passed to Optim that will pass it back to fn in case it does not need it. My code is the following: mat <-

Hi Tom, I am not entirely sure what the problem, you haven't been very specific. If you want general linear constraints on your parameters, ie linear combinations of parameters summing to some value, constrOptim may be of help. hth, ingmar Ingmar Visser Developmental Processes Research Group Department of Psychology University of Amsterdam http://users.fmg.uva.nl/ivisser/ -----Original

I have a function of several variables which I wish to minimise over four variables, two of the upper bounds for which are defined in terms of other variables in the model over which minimisation will take place. I cannot work out how to code this in such a way as to avoid getting an error message when I run the code. If anyone can provide any assistance I will be most grateful. Best Regards

Hi, R guys: I'm using L-BFGS-B method of optim for minimization problem. My function called besselI function which need non-negative parameter and the besselI will overflow if the parameter is too large. So I set the constraint box which is reasonable for my problem. But the point outside the box was test, and I got error. My program and the error follows. This program depends on CircStats

Does anybody know to introduce EQUALITY constraints in 'constrOptim' function? BR, Shubha This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged i...{{dropped:13}}

Hi, Can I use "constrOptim" for quadratic constraints? If not, which optimizer can I go for? BR, Shubha This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged i...{{dropped:13}}

Hello, I'm trying to run constrOptim. It returns to me an error about the fact that constraints arguments (ui and ci) are non compatibles: > optout= constrOptim(startparams, f=ImpulseSS, grad=grImpulse, ui=UI, ci=CI, data=gexp[k,], t=t) Error in ui %*% theta : non-conformable arguments I would like to point out that I can calculate that product in the command line: > UI %*%

I'm using the function constrOptim together with the "SANN" method and my objective function (f) has two parameters. One of the parameters needs be into (2^(-10), 2^4) range and the other into (2^(-2), 2^12) range. How can I do it using constrOptim?? Thank you André Rossi Alertas do Yahoo! Mail em seu celular. Saiba mais em http://br.mobile.yahoo.com/mailalertas/

Hello list reader, I am trying to form some constraints for an optimization I am working on. I think I have understand the use of the constraints in matrix form. I use them like: constr_mat<- -diag(2) constr_vec<- rep(-0.05,2) constr_mat<- rbind(constr_mat, diag(2)) constr_vec<- c(constr_vec, rep(-1, 2)) To get parameters in the interval [-1, 0.05]. (And this works so far) Now I

I am trying to optimize a likelihood function using constrOptim. I know from prior research that, e.g. x1>x2. Is there a way to include that constraint into the optimization routine, i.e. the ci constraint? The examples I found only use absolute numeric values for the constraint and not relative values. My attempts to include it into ci failed: e.g. ci=c(1, x[1]). Am I using the

Hello All, I am stuck in the following problem. Cexpt=c(0,25,50,100,150,300,250,125,40) t=c(0,0.2,0.4,0.6,1,4,8,12,24) theta0= vector of 6 parms (My initial parameter) A=Constraint matrix (hopefully 6*6) B= Constraint vector of length 6) Cfit=function(t,theta){ J(t)=function(theta,t) Cfit=function(J(t),constant) return(Cfit) } loss=function(theta,t,Cexpt) {

Hi, I am having trouble using constrOptim. My target is to do a portfolio optimization and there some constraints have to be fulfilled. 1) The weight of each share of the portfolio has to be greater than 0 2) The sum of these weights has to be 1 I am able to fulfill either the first or the second constraint but not both. One simple way would be to fulfill the first constraint by using optim as

Dear kind R-experts. Does anybody have an experience to use optim function? If yes, what is the main difference between two method "BFGS" vs "L-BFGS-B"? I used "BFGS" method and got what I wanted. But when I used "L-BFGS-B" the error message said that "L-BFGS-B needs finite values of fn". So that means "BFGS" method can handle even if fn

Hi all, I'm trying to figure out the effective differences between BFGS and L-BFGS-B are, besides the obvious that L-BFGS-B should be using a lot less memory, and the user can provide box constraints. 1) Why would you ever want to use BFGS, if L-BFGS-B does the same thing but use less memory? 2) If i'm optimizing with respect to a variable x that must be non-negative, a common approach

Hi, When using method L-BFGS-B along with a parscale argument, should the lower and upper bounds provided be on the scaled or unscaled values? Thanks. Cheers, -- Seb

The the use of optim with the L-BFGS-B method for the following simple function gives erroneous results. Any help appreciated! Best, Bob Reilly # Code: V=function(p){ p1=p[1];p2=p[2] y=p1*p2-.4*(p1+p2) return(-y)} p=c(.2,.2) # p=c(.8,.8) max=optim(p,V,method = "L-BFGS-B",lower=c(0,0),upper=c(1,1)) max1=optim(max$par,V,method = "L-BFGS-B",lower=c(0,0),upper=c(1,1))

Hello, A couple of ideas... Im not clear on your whole problem however... Consider making use of the lgamma function, which returns the natural log of the gamma function. This may help. The gamma function gets awfully, big very fast. Also multivariable likelihoods can be bumpy like a mountain range, with minor peaks and valleys. It is possible that your likelihood has such a shape. Maybe

Hi, I am using optim with a L-BFGS-B method to minimize a function. As I've understood, the way to specify a tolerance for stopping optimization is through "factr" argument. My function, is by construction, minimal when equal to 1. I wonder if there is any way to pass this info to "optim". If not, how "factr" argument works (I am quite confused about the

Hi all! I'm running some simulations and I need to estimate some paramaters with optim( ), in some cases optim stops with the next message: "L-BFGS-B needs finite values of 'fn' " I would like to know how to include and "if" condition when this happen, could it be something like: myfun <- optim(....) # run my function

Have you tried "optimx" package that John Nash and I wrote? The main purpose is to be able to readily compare multiple optimizers on a particular class of problems and see which one seems to do the best. It doesn't include nloptr, but most other optimizers are there. Ravi ________________________________________ From: R-devel <r-devel-bounces at r-project.org> on behalf of