similar to: Fisher test problem

Hi, I noted a discrepancy between R and openepi when I ran a fisher test with the same matrix. In R: > a=matrix(c(1,2,6,17), nrow=2) > a [,1] [,2] [1,] 1 6 [2,] 2 17 > fisher.test(a, conf.int=T) Fisher's Exact Test for Count Data data: a p-value = 1 alternative hypothesis: true odds ratio is not equal to 1 95 percent confidence interval: 0.02061498

I'm facing this problem on R GUI version 2.10.0 on Windows Vista. I have not changed Windows settings or R GUI settings much except to change from MDI to SDI. Someone else reported this problem a few months ago: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2009-April/195714.html but it wasn't followed up. I'd change the settings on Preferences, but there's no help explaining the

Sir, I have a problem here while applying chisquare test to the following Data ( below the subject of this mail) ...when I wanted to test the significance using three different free statistical packages, here R, EpiInfo and OpenEpi. *Only OpenEpi accepts the test based on Cochran's Recommendations. * R says " chi squared approximation may be incorrect." Does it mean the same as

I'm seeing what looks to me like odd behaviour when I use na.omit on a simple "length" function, as follows. > sno [1] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 > a [1] 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 > b [1] 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 NA 0 0 0 NA 0 1 NA 0 1 0 0

¿Alguien sabe si el test de reacciones extremas de Moses está escrito en algún paquete de R? Gracias de antemano.

I'm working on a personal project which involves lowering a superset of LLVM to "vanilla" LLVM. Part of this involves rewriting types. I'm working off of the 2.6 code base, so this may have been addressed in a bug fix. I'm having trouble with refineAbstractType and recursive types. Specifically, I'm creating opaque types to serve as placeholders for the final

I have written test.ll as below and ran 'opt' on it as " opt -std-compile-opts test.ll -S -o -" . But the output shows that there is code motion around the barrier intrinsics. test.ll ------- ; ModuleID = 'test.bc' define void @test(i16* %I_0, i16* %I_1, i16* %I_2, i16* %I_3, i16* %O_0) { entry: %T_0 = load volatile i16* %I_0 %T_1 = load volatile i16* %I_1 %T_2 =

is there any guarantee that the nvptx intrinsic "llvm.nvvm.barrier0" will not be moved around by opt ? In other words, can I expect all the instructions above "llvm.nvvm.barrier0" to remain above it and those below it to remain below, after all the opt passes are run ? If that is not the case, is there a way to define such an intrinsic ? Thanks. -------------- next part

Hi, I have a function that I need to do double integration: \int^T_0 \int^t_0 N(\delta / \sigma \sqrt(u)) (1-N(\delta / \sigma \sqrt(u))) du dt where N(x) is a standard normal probability of x. I start off by writing an inner integral into a function. Meaning \int^t_0 N(\delta,\sigma \sqrt(u)) (1-N(\delta,\sigma \sqrt(u))) du. Then calling integrate function on this function. This

Suppose we have the following data set: Men Women Dieting 10 30 Non-dieting 5 60 If I run the Fisher exact test in R then what does alternative = greater (or less) imply? For example: mat = matrix(c(10,5,30,60), 2,2) fisher.test(mat,alternative ="greater") I get the p-value = 0.01588 and odds ratio = 3.943534. Also, when I flip the rows of

Any ideas how I would go about writing specs for views which make use of content_for? I''d like, for example, to be able to specify that ABC view places XYZ in the sidebar, which I do using content_for(:sidebar). Am I missing something obvious? Kyle

Stumbled around a bit until I figured out you need to do this: gem install deep_merge to get it to work ! “Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.” Bill Waterson (Calvin & Hobbes) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group.

Trying to update a RHEL5 x86_64 server Yum sees puppet-server 3.1.0-1.el5, but does not see puppet 3.1.0-1.el5 I tried cleaning out the cache and trying again, but no luck. I am going to download the RPM and localinstall it so I am not held up. “Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.” Bill

A simple question - using the following fishers test it appears that the P value is significant, but the CI includes 1. Is this result correct? > data.50p10min <- matrix(c(16,15, 8, 24),nrow=2) > fisher.test(data.50p10min) Fisher's Exact Test for Count Data data: data.50p10min p-value = 0.03941 alternative hypothesis: true odds ratio is not equal to 1 95

Hi all, Is there a function attribute or otherwise way to query whether a function could write to memory that outlives itself? For example writing to a global or memory passed in via a function argument would be writing to memory that outlives the function, but writing to a stack variable or allocation that isn't returned would not. Cheers, Billy Moses -------------- next part

Puppet Dashboard 1.2.23 is a maintenance release of the 1.2 series of Puppet Dashboard with bug fixes and minor features. This release is available for download at: https://downloads.puppetlabs.com/dashboard/puppet-dashboard-1.2.23.tar.gz Available in native package format in the Puppet Labs yum and apt repositories at: http://yum.puppetlabs.com and http://apt.puppetlabs.com Please report

All, Is it possible to create something which has the same effect of a variable-length phi node in the C++ api. Specifically, create a phi-node where the number of incoming values is not known at the time of its creation. If there is no such way of creating a phinode like that, would it be possible to create a dummy instruction and perform a replaceAllUsesWith? If so, what should the dummy

Hello all, During the compilation process, LLVM automatically derives various attributes about functions and values (for example that a pointer is nonnull, a function is constant, etc) that are used within a translation unit. I propose adding a pass to LLVM that allows front-ends to output derived attributes. Such a pass would be useful both for developers and end users to debug programs,

However, how would one allocate the buffer for a string if you did not know the length of the string at compile time? For instance, using the api how would one reproduce the code for the following c++ function? std::string add(std::string a, std::string b){ return a+b; } When allocating the buffer required for the new string, one can determine the length at runtime, however I do not know how

Dear R users, I am a mathematics postdoc at UC Berkeley. I have written a package in a Computational Algebra System named Singular http://www.singular.uni-kl.de to compute the Maximum Likelihood of a given probability distribution over several discrete random variables. This package gives exact answers to the problem. But more importantly, it gives All MLE solutions. My understanding is that