similar to: randomForest

Hi all! The randomForest in R enables us to prune the trees using the nodesize feature where we can stop splitting a node if it contains less than the specified no.of of records/entities at that node. However is there a way to stop the tree growing after a specified number of levels. To be more clear on what I mean by a level. Level 0 is the parent node, Level 1 has 2 daughter nodes, Level 2 has

Hi all, I have a dataset where each point is assigned to a class A, B, C, or D. Each point is also assigned to a study site. Each study site is coded with a number ranging between 1-100. This information is stored in the vector studySites. I want to run randomForests using stratified sampling, so I chose the option strata = factor(studySites) But I am not sure how to control the number of

Hi, I have done an analysis using 'rpart' to construct a Classification Tree. I am wanting to retain the output in tree form so that it is easily interpretable. However, I am wanting to compare the 'accuracy' of the tree to a Random Forest to estimate how much predictive ability is lost by using one simple tree. My understanding is that the error automatically displayed by the two

"classwt" in the current version of the randomForest package doesn't work too well. (It's what was in version 3.x of the original Fortran code by Breiman and Cutler, not the one in the new Fortran code.) I'd advise against using it. "sampsize" and "strata" can be use in conjunction. If "strata" is not specified, the class labels will be used.

Dear all , I would like to use the function randomForest to predict the probability of relocation failure of a GPS collar as a function of several environmental variables x (both factor and numeric: slope, vegetation, etc.) on a given area. The response variable y is thus success (0)/failure(1) of the relocation, and the sampling unit is the pixel of a raster map. My aim is to build a map

Hello there, I am working on an extremely unbalanced two class classification problems. I wanna use "classwt" with "down sampling" together. By checking the rfNews() in R, it looks that classwt is not working yet. Then I looked at the software from Salford. I did not find the down sampling option. I am wondering if you have any experience to deal with this problem. Do you

Does anyone know a reason why, in principle, a call to randomForest cannot accept a data frame with missing predictor values? If each individual tree is built using CART, then it seems like this should be possible. (I understand that one may impute missing values using rfImpute or some other method, but I would like to avoid doing that.) If this functionality were available, then when the trees

I have a question on the output generated by randomForest in classification mode, specifically, the confusion matrix. The confusion matrix lists the various classes and how the forest classified each one, plus the classification error. Are these numbers essentially averages over all the trees in the forest? If so, is there a way I can get the standard deviation values out of the randomForest,

Sorry for the repost, but I've really been looking, and can't find any syntax direction on this issue... Just browsing the documentation, and searching the list came up short... I have some unbalanced data and was wondering if, in a "0" v "1" classification forest, some combo of these options might yield better predictions when the proportion of one class is low (less

Hello, I am struggling to produce an MDS plot using the randomForest package with a moderately large data set. My data set has one categorical response variables, 7 predictor variables and just under 19000 observations. That means my proximity matrix is approximately 133000 by 133000 which is quite large. To train a random forest on this large a dataset I have to use my institutions high

Hello, When I plot or look at the error rate vector for a random forest (rf$err.rate) it looks like a descending function except for a few first points of the vector with error rates values lower(sometimes much lower) than the general level of error rates for a forest with such number of trees when the error rates stop descending. Does it mean that there is a tree(s) (that is built the first in

Dear R-users, While making a prediction using the randomForest function (package randomForest) I'm getting the following error message: "Error in predict.randomForest(model, newdata = CV) : No forest component in the object" Here's my complete code. For reproducing this task, please find my 2 data sets attached ( http://www.nabble.com/file/p17855119/data.rar data.rar ).

Just out of curiosity, I took the default "iris" example in the RF helpfile... but seeing the admonition against using the formula interface for large data sets, I wanted to play around a bit to see how the various options affected the output. Found something interesting I couldn't find documentation for... Just like the example... > set.seed(12) # to be sure I have

> From: Weiwei Shi > > it works. > thanks, > > but: (just curious) > why i tried previously and i got > > > is.vector(sample.size) > [1] TRUE Because a list is also a vector: > a <- c(list(1), list(2)) > a [[1]] [1] 1 [[2]] [1] 2 > is.vector(a) [1] TRUE > is.numeric(a) [1] FALSE Actually, the way I initialize a list of known length is by

I've been using the R package randomForest but there is an aspect I cannot work out the meaning of. After calling the randomForest function, the returned object contains an element called prediction, which is the prediction obtained using all the trees (at least that's my understanding). I've checked that this prediction set has the error rate as reported by err.rate. However, if I

Hi, here are three results of random forest (version 4.0-1). The results seem to be more or less the same which is strange because I changed the classwt. I hoped that for example classwt=c(0.45,0.1,0.45) would result in fewer cases classified as class 2. Did I understand something wrong? Christian x1rf <- randomForest(x=as.data.frame(mfilters[cvtrain,]),

Hi all, Had struggled in getting "Strata" in randomForest to work on this. Can I get randomForest for each of its TREE, to get ALL sample from some strata to build tree, while leaving some strata TOTALLY untouched as oob? e.g. in below, how I can tell RF to, - for tree 1 in the forest, to use only Site A and B to build the tree, while using the WHOLE Site C data for the oob error

Hi, everyone, I haven't found anything similar in the forum, so here's my problem (I'm no expert in R nor statistics): I have a data set of 59.000 cases with 9 variables each (fractional coverage of 9 different plant types, such as deciduous broad-leaved temperate trees or evergreen tropical trees etc.), which was generated by a vegetation model. In order to evaluate the quality of

Dear mailinglist members, I was wondering if there was a way to re-evaluate the instances of a tree (in the forest) again after I have manually changed a splitpoint (or split variable) of a decision node. Here's an illustration: library("randomForest") forest.rf <- randomForest(formula = Species ~ ., data = iris, do.trace = TRUE, ntree = 3, mtry = 2, norm.votes = FALSE) # I am

Hi, I'm using the package randomForest to generate a classifier for the exemplary iris data set: data(iris) iris.rf<-randomForest(Species~.,iris) Is it possible to print all decision trees in the generated forest? If so, can the trees be also written to disk? What I actually need is to translate the decision trees in a random forest into equivalent C++ if-then-else constructs to