similar to: How do I add a variable to a text file?

Hello all, Is it possible to modify a single line in a textfile? I know it is possible to load the whole text file, do the change, and save this as a new file. However, this is not practical in my case, because the document is huge and cannot be fully loaded in R. Any idea? Best, Guillaume

On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: >> Right... but that doesn't mean the call to the suspend intrinsic has to be >> the last non-terminator instruction in the basic block before you run >> CoroSplit. You can split the basic block in CoroSplit so any instructions >> after the suspend call are part of a different basic

Hello all, When I create a matrix, is there a way to make it start at [0,0], instead of [1,1]? That way, a 2x2 matrix would go from [0,0] to [1,1], instead of [1,1] to [2,2]. Best, Guillaume

Lets say you had 4 servers and you wanted to setup replicate and distribute. What methoid would be better: server sdb1 xen0 brick0 xen1 mirror0 xen2 brick1 xen3 mirror1 replicate block0 - brick0 mirror0 replicate block1 - brick1 mirror1 distribute unify - block0 block1 or server sdb1 sdb2 xen0 brick0 mirror3 xen1 brick1 mirror0 xen2 brick2 mirror1 xen3 brick3 mirror2 replicate block0 -

Hello all, I?m trying to take a huge dataset (1.5 GB) and separate it into smaller chunks with R. So far I had nothing but problems. I cannot load the whole dataset in R due to memory problems. So, I instead try to load a few (100000) lines at a time (with read.table). However, R kept crashing (with no error message) at about the 6800000 line. This is extremely frustrating. To try to fix

Hi Rasha, > for(rit=Result.begin();rit!=Result.end();++rit) > { > Value* Address= BlockAddress::get (*rit); > > IndirectBrInst *IBI = IndirectBrInst::Create(Address, Result.size(),i->getTerminator() ); > IBI->addDestination((*rit)); > } This would be creating a block looking something like: [ Do stuff ] indirectbr i8*

I have 6 boxes with a client config (see below) across 6 boxes. I am using distribute across 3 replicate pairs. Since I am running xen I need to disable-direct-io and that slows things down quite a bit. My thought was to move the replicate / distribute to the backend server config so that self heal can happen on faster backend rather then frontend client with disable-direct-io. Does this

> > >>> >>> One of our definitions of non-determinism is simply "output from command >>> line tools should always be bit identical given identical inputs", which is >>> suitable for content-based caching build systems like Bazel. >>> >> Just to point out: These systems already often have to ignore whitespace >> differences,

Hi Eli: >> semantics of the fork intrinsic... thinking about it a bit more, I think >> you're going to run into problems with trying to keep around a return block >> through optimizations: How about this? Make all control flow explicit (duh). declare i8 coro.suspend([...]) returns: 0 - resume 1 - cleanup anything else - suspend Now we can get

Hi 1- for(rit=Result.begin();rit!=Result.end();++rit) { Value* Address= BlockAddress::get (*rit); IndirectBrInst *IBI = IndirectBrInst::Create(Address, Result.size(),i->getTerminator() ); IBI->addDestination((*rit)); } I tried this code , but the needed destination wasn't added. 2- About LLVM backend $ llc -march=cpp example_file.ll -o I think it

Dear Madame, Dear Sir, I am able to obtain the coefficients from a 'summary' of 'lm', but NOT from a 'summary' of 'aov'. The following example shows my steps. ## Initialize rm(list = ls()) # remove (almost) everything in the working environment utils::data(npk, package="MASS") # get data model <- yield ~ block + N*P*K ## Using lm npk.lm <-

Dear all, I want to compute the average of the three blocks for each x-variable which is equal slide in the code below. How can I do that ? block x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 1 23 22 23 24 23 1 21 25 26 21 39 1 23 24 22 23 23 2 20 21 23 24 28 2 32 23 34 24 26 2 19

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Gor Nishanov <gornishanov at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Eli: > > >> Naively, you would expect that it would be legal to hoist the store... > >> but that breaks your coroutine semantics because the global could be > mutated > >> between the first return and the resume. > > Hmmm... I don't see the problem. I think

I would appreciate it if someone could explain the results of the example from the aov() help file. The output given below is different from book Venables and Ripley - MASS The results In R1.5.1 (Under windows) is as follows: > N <- c(0,1,0,1,1,1,0,0,0,1,1,0,1,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,1,1,0,0) > P <- c(1,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,1,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,1,0,0,1,0,1,1,0) > K <-

Sorry, I pasted the wrong file in earlier... this is the correct one: pValCalculator(b, n=20, m=20) { ind <- 1:min(c(n,m)) prob <- (1-pnorm(b,sd=std*sqrt(ind))) prob1 <- sum((n-ind+1)*(m-ind+1)*prob) prob1 } inputData <- scan("/users/lvssso/projects/LAMA/output/pValLamaScore.tmp", list(block1 = "",block2 = "",width1 = 0,width2 = 0,alignment = 0,score

I like Sweave, which I consider to be a great contribution. I have just written a .Rnw document that comes to about 6 pages of mixed code and mathematical explanation. Now I want to turn the R code into a function. My R code currently contains statements like N<-1000 and theta<- pi/10. In the next version of the document, I want N and theta to be parameters of a function, so that they can be

On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:34 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Daniel Berlin via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev < >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>

Hi, I am running a large number of jobs (thousands) in parallel (linux OS 64bit), R version 2.14.1 (2011-12-22), Platform: x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu (64-bit). Up to yesterday everything ran fine with jobs in several blocks (block1, block2 etc) of submission. They are sent to an LSF platform to handle the parallel submission. Today I see that only one of the blocks (the 19) has not finished

This patch does two things. First we no longer explicitly read in the blocks we''re trying to readahead. For things like balance_level we may never actually use the blocks so this just adds uneeded latency, and balance_level and split_node will both read in the blocks they care about explicitly so if the blocks need to be waited on it will be done there. Secondly we no longer drop the

Hello Samba team ! I'am in a very delicate situation. After an upgrade to debian Stretch my DRS stopped working. I have three DCs (fichdc, fichds01, fichds02), all Debian Stretch, all with the same problem. Everything seems to be fine except DRS. -> File shares works -> DNS (with bind9 DLZ) works -> "kinit administrator" works -> "kinit -k FICHDC$" works ->