Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Output Data Formatting Question"
2009 Feb 04
5
Target Plot?
I've done a little snooping around the R Gallery Site (http://addictedtor.free.fr/graphiques/) and the "Statistics with R" site (http://zoonek2.free.fr/UNIX/48_R/all.html), but I can't seem to find what I'm looking for.
Here is the type of plot I would like to draw:
(1) 2-D three axis plot where each axis is separated by 120-degrees (would be great if the number of axis
2014 Mar 13
1
[PATCH RFC v6 09/11] pvqspinlock, x86: Add qspinlock para-virtualization support
On 03/13/2014 09:57 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 13/03/2014 12:21, David Vrabel ha scritto:
>> On 12/03/14 18:54, Waiman Long wrote:
>>> This patch adds para-virtualization support to the queue spinlock in
>>> the same way as was done in the PV ticket lock code. In essence, the
>>> lock waiters will spin for a specified number of times (QSPIN_THRESHOLD
2014 Mar 13
1
[PATCH RFC v6 09/11] pvqspinlock, x86: Add qspinlock para-virtualization support
On 03/13/2014 09:57 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 13/03/2014 12:21, David Vrabel ha scritto:
>> On 12/03/14 18:54, Waiman Long wrote:
>>> This patch adds para-virtualization support to the queue spinlock in
>>> the same way as was done in the PV ticket lock code. In essence, the
>>> lock waiters will spin for a specified number of times (QSPIN_THRESHOLD
2013 Apr 20
2
matrix of size 30^5
Dear R helpers
Reproducible example:
#warning - this causes a hard freeze on the machines I've tried it on
matrix.holder<- matrix(rnorm(150), nrow=30, ncol=5)
Out=
expand.grid(matrix.holder[,1],matrix.holder[,2],matrix.holder[,3],matrix.holder[,4],
matrix.holder[,5])
Problem:
I'm running an analysis that I would like to do using a matrix containing
all the possible combinations of
2014 Mar 13
3
[PATCH RFC v6 09/11] pvqspinlock, x86: Add qspinlock para-virtualization support
On 12/03/14 18:54, Waiman Long wrote:
> This patch adds para-virtualization support to the queue spinlock in
> the same way as was done in the PV ticket lock code. In essence, the
> lock waiters will spin for a specified number of times (QSPIN_THRESHOLD
> = 2^14) and then halted itself. The queue head waiter will spins
> 2*QSPIN_THRESHOLD times before halting itself. When it has
2014 Mar 13
3
[PATCH RFC v6 09/11] pvqspinlock, x86: Add qspinlock para-virtualization support
On 12/03/14 18:54, Waiman Long wrote:
> This patch adds para-virtualization support to the queue spinlock in
> the same way as was done in the PV ticket lock code. In essence, the
> lock waiters will spin for a specified number of times (QSPIN_THRESHOLD
> = 2^14) and then halted itself. The queue head waiter will spins
> 2*QSPIN_THRESHOLD times before halting itself. When it has
2016 Jul 06
2
[PATCH v2 2/4] powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check
Cc Paolo, kvm ml
2016-07-06 12:58 GMT+08:00 xinhui <xinhui.pan at linux.vnet.ibm.com>:
> Hi, wanpeng
>
> On 2016?07?05? 17:57, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>>
>> Hi Xinhui,
>> 2016-06-28 22:43 GMT+08:00 Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan at linux.vnet.ibm.com>:
>>>
>>> This is to fix some lock holder preemption issues. Some other locks
>>> implementation
2016 Jul 06
2
[PATCH v2 2/4] powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check
Cc Paolo, kvm ml
2016-07-06 12:58 GMT+08:00 xinhui <xinhui.pan at linux.vnet.ibm.com>:
> Hi, wanpeng
>
> On 2016?07?05? 17:57, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>>
>> Hi Xinhui,
>> 2016-06-28 22:43 GMT+08:00 Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan at linux.vnet.ibm.com>:
>>>
>>> This is to fix some lock holder preemption issues. Some other locks
>>> implementation
2014 May 12
3
[PATCH v10 03/19] qspinlock: Add pending bit
2014-05-07 11:01-0400, Waiman Long:
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org>
>
> Because the qspinlock needs to touch a second cacheline; add a pending
> bit and allow a single in-word spinner before we punt to the second
> cacheline.
I think there is an unwanted scenario on virtual machines:
1) VCPU sets the pending bit and start spinning.
2) Pending VCPU gets
2014 May 12
3
[PATCH v10 03/19] qspinlock: Add pending bit
2014-05-07 11:01-0400, Waiman Long:
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org>
>
> Because the qspinlock needs to touch a second cacheline; add a pending
> bit and allow a single in-word spinner before we punt to the second
> cacheline.
I think there is an unwanted scenario on virtual machines:
1) VCPU sets the pending bit and start spinning.
2) Pending VCPU gets
2012 Nov 06
1
Filling dataframe incorrectly in for loop
Hi everyone,
I am writing a simple script to read in a data file, search through the data
file for an exact character match for a microRNA name, subset those rows,
and aggregrate a dataframe with those subselections all in a for loop. This
is what I have so far:
#READ IN DATA
file1 = "C:/Desktop/mirtarget2_predictions.txt"
data = read.table(file1, header=FALSE, sep="\t")
2016 Jul 05
2
[PATCH v2 2/4] powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check
Hi Xinhui,
2016-06-28 22:43 GMT+08:00 Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan at linux.vnet.ibm.com>:
> This is to fix some lock holder preemption issues. Some other locks
> implementation do a spin loop before acquiring the lock itself. Currently
> kernel has an interface of bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu). It take the cpu
> as parameter and return true if the cpu is preempted. Then kernel can
2016 Jul 05
2
[PATCH v2 2/4] powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check
Hi Xinhui,
2016-06-28 22:43 GMT+08:00 Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan at linux.vnet.ibm.com>:
> This is to fix some lock holder preemption issues. Some other locks
> implementation do a spin loop before acquiring the lock itself. Currently
> kernel has an interface of bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu). It take the cpu
> as parameter and return true if the cpu is preempted. Then kernel can
2014 Mar 17
2
[PATCH v6 05/11] pvqspinlock, x86: Allow unfair spinlock in a PV guest
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 01:44:34PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 03/14/2014 04:30 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 04:05:19PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> >>On 03/13/2014 11:15 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >>>On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 02:54:52PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> >>>>+static inline void arch_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock)
2014 Mar 17
2
[PATCH v6 05/11] pvqspinlock, x86: Allow unfair spinlock in a PV guest
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 01:44:34PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 03/14/2014 04:30 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 04:05:19PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> >>On 03/13/2014 11:15 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >>>On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 02:54:52PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> >>>>+static inline void arch_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock)
2009 Aug 04
5
Stacked plots with common x-axis and different y-axis
Is there a place that shows how to create two plots that are stacked on top of each other where they share a common x-axis scale, but have differnt y-axis scale?
Say have the following data: airquality
Stack plot(airquality$Day, airquality$Wind) on top of plot(airquality$Day, airquality$Temp).
I am interested in stacking the two on top of each other with no seam, or plotting the two lines with
2008 Sep 08
17
btrfs_tree_lock & trylock
I did some btrfs RTFS over the weeking and I have a hard time understanding
what this code is attempting to do:
28 int btrfs_tree_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb)
29 {
30 int i;
31
32 if (mutex_trylock(&eb->mutex))
33 return 0;
34 for (i = 0; i < 512; i++) {
35 cpu_relax();
36 if
2009 Nov 20
6
How to add a top level title to multiple plots
How can I add an overall plot title to these four plots?
I would like to have something that says, "Distribution Comparisons":
par(mfrow = c(2, 2))
# Plot 1
plot(rnorm(10),type="l",col="red")
title(main = list(paste("Normal"),
????????????????????????? col="black", cex = 1.0))
# Plot 2
plot(rpois(10,
2015 Mar 02
1
Update
I do not understand that you say me????
> Any reason you are not using the git protocol?
>
> git://git.samba.org
>
> David
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dr David Holder CEng FIET MIEEE
>
> Erion Ltd, An Cala, Inverkirkaig, Lochinver, Sutherland, IV27 4LR, UK
>
> Reception: +44 (0)1422 207000
>
> Direct Dial: +44
2014 Mar 14
4
[PATCH v6 05/11] pvqspinlock, x86: Allow unfair spinlock in a PV guest
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 04:05:19PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 03/13/2014 11:15 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 02:54:52PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> >>+static inline void arch_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock)
> >>+{
> >>+ if (static_key_false(¶virt_unfairlocks_enabled))
> >>+ queue_spin_lock_unfair(lock);
>