Re: MASQ nightmare - 99% solved

Guilsson .
Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:58:50 -0000

On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Tom Eastep <teastep@shorewall.net>
wrote:
> Guilsson . wrote:
>  > In fact, my doubt is more "generic", not specific do H.323.
>  > If you have a module loaded in kernel, what is the precedence ?
>  > Rules are processed before or after module takes place, considering,
>  > in this case (H.323) the module "try" to do Nat on the
traffic ?
>
>  The module can do whatever it wants to.

But before of after iptables handling it ?

-Guilsson