Re: FTP/DNAT Issue

Jon
Sun, 17 Dec 2006 03:32:00 -0000

Well that certainly sets the tone.

I''m happy to see that our decision to discontinue Shorewall in future
builds wasn''t in error.  I think I''ve been quite civil even to
the point of being apologetic. You are being just plain rude, Tom.

I believe the level of detail in my original post, although incorrect, did serve
to show that I had read the docs. I was struggling with a conceptual issue which
I have now resolved despite your apparent reluctance to be helpful. Thankfully
another on the list isn''t burdened by whatever ails you.

OSS has enough of a battle for acceptance and the lack of support from authors
is one thing that always comes up. To date I have almost always been able to
show that the author is usually more than willing to help and get OSS by the
gatekeepers. You are not helping the battle.

J


Sent from the road...
+1.403.770.2837
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Eastep <tom.eastep@hp.com>
Date: Saturday, Dec 16, 2006 8:12 pm
Subject: Re: [Shorewall-users] FTP/DNAT Issue

Jon <me <at> jonwatson.ca> writes:
>
>>
> Because I was confused about DNAT.
>
> So...knowing what I know now...amd I looking at a net to fw rule to do what
I need? I''m not sure how to refer to
> the box itself.
>
>Then maybe you should consult the Shorewall introductory documentation.
>
>-Tom
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>Join SourceForge.net''s Techsay panel and you''ll get the
chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys
- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>_______________________________________________
>Shorewall-users mailing list
>Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users