Re: Masqueraded static IPs

Tom Eastep
Fri, 23 Jan 2004 21:18:08 -0000

On Friday 23 January 2004 01:04 pm, Thomas Svenson wrote:

>
> Before I do that I just want to check. Can I still have No as HAVEROUTE
> then?

Yes.

>
> > Where <subnet> is the RFC1918 subnet that resides off of eth1.
> >
> > Or, if there is no such subnet just remove the
> > /etc/shorewall/masq entry all together. In that case, the entry in
> > /etc/shorewall/masq is probably there
>
> I use a RFC1918 subnet there, even though all machines on the
"inside" have
> static IP.

Then why do you need masquerading at all?