[Shorewall-users] iptables: Invalid argument

Phil Tomson
Wed, 10 Sep 2003 12:29:00 -0000

I haven''t tried that yet.  I think there was a dependencey issue with
installing that rpm....

I''m actually starting to play directly with iptables now to see if I
can
get it going that way...

Phil

On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Eduardo Ferreira wrote:

> man, I''m out of ideas.  had you already tried the last version
1.4.6c? or
> any other than that you are using?
>
>
>
>
>
> Phil Tomson <ptkwt@aracnet.com>
> Sent by: shorewall-users-bounces@lists.shorewall.net
> 10/09/2003 15:56
> Please respond to
> Shorewall Users Mailing List <shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net>
>
>
> To
> Shorewall Users Mailing List <shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net>
> cc
>
> Subject
> Re: [Shorewall-users] iptables: Invalid argument
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Just tried replacing the ''detect'' with
''-'' for the net ppp0 entry of my
> interfaces file and it doidin''t help... the problem persists.
>
>
> Phil
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Eduardo Ferreira wrote:
>
> > me thinks it depends on the type of service you get.  I use a ADSL
> > connection via ppp0 and in my shorewall interfaces file I read:
> >
> > net     ppp0    -       norfc1918,dhcp,routefilter,tcpflags
> >
> > I use ''-'' instead of ''detect'' in
the broadcast column following the
> > guidelines of the interface files (and the 3rd example in the same
> file).
> > works here...
> >
> > HIH,
> >
> > Eduardo Ferreira
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Phil Tomson <ptkwt@aracnet.com>
> > Sent by: shorewall-users-bounces@lists.shorewall.net
> > 10/09/2003 14:40
> > Please respond to
> > Shorewall Users Mailing List
<shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net>
> >
> >
> > To
> > Shorewall Users Mailing List
<shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net>
> > cc
> >
> > Subject
> > Re: [Shorewall-users] iptables: Invalid argument
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 10 Sep 2003, Ed Greshko wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 16:11, Phil Tomson wrote:
> > > >  just tried the uninstall-reinstall idea.  Problem still
exists.
> > > >
> > > > The offending iptables command is this (from the trace):
> > > > iptables -t nat -A ppp0_masq -s 255.255.255.255/32 -d
0.0.0.0/0 -j
> > > > MASQUERADE
> > >
> > > The command you cite above looks rather odd to me....
> > >
> > > On my system I see the following...
> > >
> > > iptables -t nat -A eth0_masq -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d 0.0.0.0/0 -j
> > MASQUERADE
> > >
> > > where 192.168.1.0/24 is the network address of eth1...
> > >
> >
> > Hmmmm.... I thought the  255.255.255.255 was a bit odd.
> >
> > Any idea how that number is determined?
> >
> > Phil
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Shorewall-users mailing list
> > Post: Shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net
> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> > http://lists.shorewall.net/mailman/listinfo/shorewall-users
> > Support: http://www.shorewall.net/support.htm
> > FAQ: http://www.shorewall.net/FAQ.htm
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Shorewall-users mailing list
> > Post: Shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net
> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.shorewall.net/mailman/listinfo/shorewall-users
> > Support: http://www.shorewall.net/support.htm
> > FAQ: http://www.shorewall.net/FAQ.htm
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Shorewall-users mailing list
> Post: Shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.shorewall.net/mailman/listinfo/shorewall-users
> Support: http://www.shorewall.net/support.htm
> FAQ: http://www.shorewall.net/FAQ.htm
>
> _______________________________________________
> Shorewall-users mailing list
> Post: Shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.shorewall.net/mailman/listinfo/shorewall-users
> Support: http://www.shorewall.net/support.htm
> FAQ: http://www.shorewall.net/FAQ.htm
>