Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "ramcfg_vrefd_off".
2017 Apr 10
0
[PATCH 03/11] nvkm/gddr5: MR calculation for timing table v1.0
...e/nvkm/subdev/bios/ramcfg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/subdev/bios/ramcfg.h
@@ -40,6 +40,10 @@ struct nvbios_ramcfg {
unsigned ramcfg_DLLoff;
unsigned ramcfg_RON;
unsigned ramcfg_FBVDDQ;
+ unsigned ramcfg_LowFreq;
+ unsigned ramcfg_WCKPin;
+ unsigned ramcfg_Hf_VREF;
+ unsigned ramcfg_VREFD_off;
union {
struct {
unsigned ramcfg_00_03_01:1;
@@ -82,12 +86,9 @@ struct nvbios_ramcfg {
unsigned ramcfg_11_01_04:1;
unsigned ramcfg_11_01_08:1;
unsigned ramcfg_11_01_10:1;
- unsigned ramcfg_11_01_40:1;
- unsigned ramcfg_11_01_80:1;
unsigned ramcfg_11_02_03:2;
unsign...
2017 Apr 10
11
Preparations for Fermi DRAM clock changes
No, no, these will not implement Fermi reclocking. This set of patches
contains some of the preparatory work that I deem stable enough to
move upstream. Notable changes
- Training pattern upload routines from GK104+ now shared with GT215+
- Timing calculation for Fermi
- GDDR5 MR calculation from VBIOS timing table v1.0. Also useful for that
pesky GT 240.
- A routine to translate a VBIOS init
2017 Apr 10
14
RESEND Preparations for Fermi DRAM clock changes
Two patches went missing as a result of PEBCAK. No v2 marks as nothing
changed really. Just resending for easier enforcement of patch order
in other people's trees. Sorry for the noise.
Original message:
No, no, these will not implement Fermi reclocking. This set of patches
contains some of the preparatory work that I deem stable enough to
move upstream. Notable changes
- Training pattern