search for: ramcfg_vrefd_off

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "ramcfg_vrefd_off".

2017 Apr 10
0
[PATCH 03/11] nvkm/gddr5: MR calculation for timing table v1.0
...e/nvkm/subdev/bios/ramcfg.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/subdev/bios/ramcfg.h @@ -40,6 +40,10 @@ struct nvbios_ramcfg { unsigned ramcfg_DLLoff; unsigned ramcfg_RON; unsigned ramcfg_FBVDDQ; + unsigned ramcfg_LowFreq; + unsigned ramcfg_WCKPin; + unsigned ramcfg_Hf_VREF; + unsigned ramcfg_VREFD_off; union { struct { unsigned ramcfg_00_03_01:1; @@ -82,12 +86,9 @@ struct nvbios_ramcfg { unsigned ramcfg_11_01_04:1; unsigned ramcfg_11_01_08:1; unsigned ramcfg_11_01_10:1; - unsigned ramcfg_11_01_40:1; - unsigned ramcfg_11_01_80:1; unsigned ramcfg_11_02_03:2; unsign...
2017 Apr 10
11
Preparations for Fermi DRAM clock changes
No, no, these will not implement Fermi reclocking. This set of patches contains some of the preparatory work that I deem stable enough to move upstream. Notable changes - Training pattern upload routines from GK104+ now shared with GT215+ - Timing calculation for Fermi - GDDR5 MR calculation from VBIOS timing table v1.0. Also useful for that pesky GT 240. - A routine to translate a VBIOS init
2017 Apr 10
14
RESEND Preparations for Fermi DRAM clock changes
Two patches went missing as a result of PEBCAK. No v2 marks as nothing changed really. Just resending for easier enforcement of patch order in other people's trees. Sorry for the noise. Original message: No, no, these will not implement Fermi reclocking. This set of patches contains some of the preparatory work that I deem stable enough to move upstream. Notable changes - Training pattern