Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "in128".
Did you mean:
i128
2014 Nov 24
4
[LLVMdev] Proposed patches for Clang 3.5.1
....5.1.
Proposed clang patches:
* r213769 - Fix test/Driver/cl-x86-flags.c by providing explicit -target
* r214025 - [Driver][Mips] Check output of -dynamic-linker arguments by the Clang driver
* r214662 - [Mips] Add the `mips64-linux-gnu` target to the test case to check `in128` type handling.
* r217147 - [mips] Zero-sized structs cannot be ignored in MipsABIInfo::classifyReturnType() for O32
Proposed llvm patches:
* r216920 - Fix left shifts of negative values in MipsDisassembler.
* r221408 - [mips64] Fix MIPS64 exception personality encoding...
2014 Nov 24
4
[LLVMdev] Proposed patches for Clang 3.5.1
...o. Could you be pull this request into a separate mail and cc him.
Ok.
> > * r214025 - [Driver][Mips] Check output of -dynamic-linker arguments
> by the Clang driver
> >
> > * r214662 - [Mips] Add the `mips64-linux-gnu` target to the test case to
> check `in128` type handling.
> >
> > * r217147 - [mips] Zero-sized structs cannot be ignored in
> MipsABIInfo::classifyReturnType() for O32
>
> These look OK to me you you can merge them to the 3.5 branch yourself,
> or if you aren't comfortable with this, I can do it. If...