search for: hdj

...t=/dev/nfs nfsroot=192.168.0.18:/home/mike/nfs/ nfsaddrs=192.168.0.50:192.168.0.18::255.255.255.0:epc:eth0:none LABEL dos KERNEL rom-dos.bss # Add the following line to append for TS-3300 or TS-5300 Rev C or older # hdb=none hdc=none hdd=none hde=none hdf=none hdg=none hdh=none hdi=none hdj=none hdk=none hdl=none # for TS-9500 with Compact Flash as IDE2 and VGA as console: #1) add jumper for IRQ5 on TS-9500 on TS-3300 or TS-5300 only #2) add "ide1=0x170,0x376,5" to APPEND line, remove "hdc=none" if present #3) change console=ttyS1 to console=tty1 #NOTE: your logi...

...0 free] pvscan -- ACTIVE PV "/dev/hdk" of VG "foo3" [74.50 GB / 0 free] pvscan -- ACTIVE PV "/dev/hdl" of VG "foo2" [74.50 GB / 0 free] pvscan -- ACTIVE PV "/dev/hdi" of VG "foo1" [76.31 GB / 0 free] pvscan -- ACTIVE PV "/dev/hdj" of VG "foo2" [74.50 GB / 0 free] pvscan -- ACTIVE PV "/dev/hdg" of VG "foo3" [76.31 GB / 0 free] pvscan -- ACTIVE PV "/dev/hde" of VG "foo1" [74.52 GB / 0 free] pvscan -- total: 8 [603.47 GB] / in use: 8 [603.47 GB] / in no VG: 0 [0] # A...

I'm sorry if this post came through already ... Hi, I'm working on a project where the plan is to place a number of Samba servers on different locations as file and print servers. The samba server is supposed to be a part of the AD, which is easily done, but the samba servers are to contain a number of shares that only people with a valid logon on the AD will be able to access. How can

Hi, Apologies, this is going to be quite long - I'm going to provide as much info as possible. I'm running a system with ext3 fs on software RAID. The RAID set-up is as shown below: jlm@nijinsky:~$ cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [linear] [raid0] [raid1] [raid5] read_ahead 1024 sectors md0 : active raid1 hdc1[1] hda1[0] 96256 blocks [2/2] [UU] md5 : active raid1 hdk1[1] hde1[0]

At the risk of angering the crash Gods, my sustem has NOT crashed again since I downgraded the kernel from 2.6.18-1.2239.fc5 to 2.6.18-1.2200.fc5. Given that newfound stability, and my lack of time, I'm going to put on hold any further diagnostics, until the next kernel revision is released. I have submitted a report at bugzilla.redhat.com (bug 218128). (Ah, nuts; accidentally created a