search for: gsos

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "gsos".

Did you mean: gso
2013 Apr 23
0
[LLVMdev] [Polly] GSoC Proposal: Reducing LLVM-Polly Compiling overhead
Hi all, This is Star Tan, who proposed a project to reduce the Polly compiling overhead several days ago. After that, I kept on moving forward for this project. By now, I am much familiar with Polly and LLVM. Thanks to the help from Polly and LLVM group, I have also provided some LLVM-Polly patch files for this project, such as r179673, r179586, r179159, r179158, r179157, r178530. I am
2013 Apr 30
0
[LLVMdev] [Polly] GSoC Proposal: Reducing LLVM-Polly Compiling overhead
...eb4071e9556a6eb2b7fd5/%5BGSoc2013%5D%5BLLVM-Polly%5D+Reducing+Polly+Compiling+Overhead I would submit the proposal in recent days. Any comments or advice would be appreciated. Thank you! At 2013-04-26 11:08:02,tanmx_star <tanmx_star at yeah.net> wrote: >Hi all, > >I have updated my GSoS proposal: "FastPolly: Reducing LLVM-Polly Compiling overhead" (https://gist.github.com/tanstar/5441808). I think the pass ordering problem you discussed early can be also investigated in this project! > >Is there any comment or advice about my proposal? I appreciate all your help...
2013 Mar 23
2
[LLVMdev] [Polly]GSoC Proposal: Reducing LLVM-Polly Compiling overhead
On 03/23/2013 05:23 PM, tanmx_star wrote: > Dear Tobies, > > Sorry for the late reply. > > I have checked the experiment and I found some of the data is mismatched because of incorrect manual copy and paste, so I have written a Shell script to automatically collect data. Newest data is listed in the attached file. Yes, automatizing those experiments to make them reproducible is a
2013 Apr 26
4
[LLVMdev] [Polly] GSoC Proposal: Reducing LLVM-Polly Compiling overhead
Hi all, I have updated my GSoS proposal: "FastPolly: Reducing LLVM-Polly Compiling overhead" (https://gist.github.com/tanstar/5441808). I think the pass ordering problem you discussed early can be also investigated in this project! Is there any comment or advice about my proposal? I appreciate all your help and advi...
2013 May 02
0
[LLVMdev] [Polly] GSoC Proposal: Reducing LLVM-Polly Compiling overhead
On 04/26/2013 05:08 AM, tanmx_star wrote: > Hi all, Hi, thanks for the update and sorry for the delay in reviewing. I just had a look at your proposal. > I have updated my GSoS proposal: "FastPolly: Reducing LLVM-Polly Compiling overhead" (https://gist.github.com/tanstar/5441808). I think the pass ordering problem you discussed early can be also investigated in this project! Yes, figuring out the optimal path ordering sequence is very good. > Is there any...