search for: for_each_ioap

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "for_each_ioap".

Did you mean: for_each_ioapic
2018 Feb 09
0
retpoline mitigation and 6.0
...= 0 (gdb)  395 if (!address) { 1: x/i $pc => 0xc10469e8 <mp_register_ioapic+56>: test   %esi,%esi 2: gsi_base = 0 (gdb)  0xc10469ea 395 if (!address) { 1: x/i $pc => 0xc10469ea <mp_register_ioapic+58>: je     0xc1046a34 <mp_register_ioapic+132> 2: gsi_base = 0 (gdb)  399 for_each_ioapic(ioapic) 1: x/i $pc => 0xc10469ec <mp_register_ioapic+60>: mov    0xc1d36144,%eax 2: gsi_base = 0 (gdb)  0xc10469f1 399 for_each_ioapic(ioapic) 1: x/i $pc => 0xc10469f1 <mp_register_ioapic+65>: test   %eax,%eax 2: gsi_base = 0 (gdb)  0xc10469f3 399 for_each_ioapic(ioapic) 1: x/...
2018 Feb 09
2
retpoline mitigation and 6.0
On Fri, 2018-02-09 at 10:36 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > > Did you get anywhere with the function attribute? Having isolated the > next boot failure to "it goes away if I compile io_apic.c without > retpoline", bisecting it per-function would help to further delay the > bit where I actually have to start *thinking*... It's mp_register_ioapic(), and only when
2018 Feb 09
3
retpoline mitigation and 6.0
...ster_ioapic+56>: test %esi,%esi > 2: gsi_base = 0 > (gdb) > 0xc10469ea 395 if (!address) { > 1: x/i $pc > => 0xc10469ea <mp_register_ioapic+58>: je 0xc1046a34 > <mp_register_ioapic+132> > 2: gsi_base = 0 > (gdb) > 399 for_each_ioapic(ioapic) > 1: x/i $pc > => 0xc10469ec <mp_register_ioapic+60>: mov 0xc1d36144,%eax > 2: gsi_base = 0 > (gdb) > 0xc10469f1 399 for_each_ioapic(ioapic) > 1: x/i $pc > => 0xc10469f1 <mp_register_ioapic+65>: test %eax,%eax > 2: gsi_base...