Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "511721".
Did you mean:
11721
2009 Aug 04
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc-4.2-2.5 fails to build from source on arm: MACHO_DYNAMIC_NO_PIC_P undeclared
...are to use clang only, not llvm-gcc, however I might be able to find
few hours to give llvm-gcc a try.
539496: There are no plans to support ARMv4 in LLVM. As for ToT ARM
builds of llvm-gcc (both for bare-metal arm-elf and normal
arm-none-linux-gnueabi triples) is broken due to two PRs: 4680, 4681
511721: I believe it should be fixed on ToT.
518592: Sounds like compiler / linker problem, it's not LLVM related at all
--
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
2009 Aug 04
3
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc-4.2-2.5 fails to build from source on arm: MACHO_DYNAMIC_NO_PIC_P undeclared
On 8/3/09, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote:
> > Thanks. Do you have fixes for the other ARM bloopers? This is the
> > forthcoming Debian version and it's now dying on arm-gnueabi when it
> > links cc1-dummy saying
>
> Please use the current Top-of-the-Tree version.
Sorry, that's not an option as I'm trying to fix the Debian
2009 Aug 21
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc-4.2-2.5 fails to build from source on arm: MACHO_DYNAMIC_NO_PIC_P undeclared
...I might be able to find
>> few hours to give llvm-gcc a try.
>> 539496: There are no plans to support ARMv4 in LLVM. As for ToT ARM
>> builds of llvm-gcc (both for bare-metal arm-elf and normal
>> arm-none-linux-gnueabi triples) is broken due to two PRs: 4680, 4681
>> 511721: I believe it should be fixed on ToT.
>> 518592: Sounds like compiler / linker problem, it's not LLVM
>> related at all
>>
>> --
>> With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
>> Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State
>> University...
2009 Aug 19
5
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc-4.2-2.5 fails to build from source on arm: MACHO_DYNAMIC_NO_PIC_P undeclared
...ot llvm-gcc, however I might be able to find
> few hours to give llvm-gcc a try.
> 539496: There are no plans to support ARMv4 in LLVM. As for ToT ARM
> builds of llvm-gcc (both for bare-metal arm-elf and normal
> arm-none-linux-gnueabi triples) is broken due to two PRs: 4680, 4681
> 511721: I believe it should be fixed on ToT.
> 518592: Sounds like compiler / linker problem, it's not LLVM related
> at all
>
> --
> With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
> Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State
> University
> _______________________...
2008 Jun 24
3
Problem with evolution while upgrading to CentOS 5.2
Hi!
When trying to prepare a workstation with (so that the real "yum
upgrade" doesn't have to download the packages)
yum upgrade --upgradeonly
it fails with these messages:
Error: Missing Dependency: libegroupwise-1.2.so.12 is needed by package evolution
Error: Missing Dependency: libgtkhtml-3.8.so.15 is needed by package evolution
Error: Missing Dependency:
2009 Aug 21
1
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc-4.2-2.5 fails to build from source on arm: MACHO_DYNAMIC_NO_PIC_P undeclared
...find
>>> few hours to give llvm-gcc a try.
>>> 539496: There are no plans to support ARMv4 in LLVM. As for ToT ARM
>>> builds of llvm-gcc (both for bare-metal arm-elf and normal
>>> arm-none-linux-gnueabi triples) is broken due to two PRs: 4680, 4681
>>> 511721: I believe it should be fixed on ToT.
>>> 518592: Sounds like compiler / linker problem, it's not LLVM
>>> related at all
>>>
>>> --
>>> With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
>>> Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg Stat...