search for: 511721

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "511721".

Did you mean: 11721
2009 Aug 04
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc-4.2-2.5 fails to build from source on arm: MACHO_DYNAMIC_NO_PIC_P undeclared
...are to use clang only, not llvm-gcc, however I might be able to find few hours to give llvm-gcc a try. 539496: There are no plans to support ARMv4 in LLVM. As for ToT ARM builds of llvm-gcc (both for bare-metal arm-elf and normal arm-none-linux-gnueabi triples) is broken due to two PRs: 4680, 4681 511721: I believe it should be fixed on ToT. 518592: Sounds like compiler / linker problem, it's not LLVM related at all -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
2009 Aug 04
3
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc-4.2-2.5 fails to build from source on arm: MACHO_DYNAMIC_NO_PIC_P undeclared
On 8/3/09, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > > Thanks. Do you have fixes for the other ARM bloopers? This is the > > forthcoming Debian version and it's now dying on arm-gnueabi when it > > links cc1-dummy saying > > Please use the current Top-of-the-Tree version. Sorry, that's not an option as I'm trying to fix the Debian
2009 Aug 21
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc-4.2-2.5 fails to build from source on arm: MACHO_DYNAMIC_NO_PIC_P undeclared
...I might be able to find >> few hours to give llvm-gcc a try. >> 539496: There are no plans to support ARMv4 in LLVM. As for ToT ARM >> builds of llvm-gcc (both for bare-metal arm-elf and normal >> arm-none-linux-gnueabi triples) is broken due to two PRs: 4680, 4681 >> 511721: I believe it should be fixed on ToT. >> 518592: Sounds like compiler / linker problem, it's not LLVM >> related at all >> >> -- >> With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov >> Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State >> University...
2009 Aug 19
5
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc-4.2-2.5 fails to build from source on arm: MACHO_DYNAMIC_NO_PIC_P undeclared
...ot llvm-gcc, however I might be able to find > few hours to give llvm-gcc a try. > 539496: There are no plans to support ARMv4 in LLVM. As for ToT ARM > builds of llvm-gcc (both for bare-metal arm-elf and normal > arm-none-linux-gnueabi triples) is broken due to two PRs: 4680, 4681 > 511721: I believe it should be fixed on ToT. > 518592: Sounds like compiler / linker problem, it's not LLVM related > at all > > -- > With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov > Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State > University > _______________________...
2008 Jun 24
3
Problem with evolution while upgrading to CentOS 5.2
Hi! When trying to prepare a workstation with (so that the real "yum upgrade" doesn't have to download the packages) yum upgrade --upgradeonly it fails with these messages: Error: Missing Dependency: libegroupwise-1.2.so.12 is needed by package evolution Error: Missing Dependency: libgtkhtml-3.8.so.15 is needed by package evolution Error: Missing Dependency:
2009 Aug 21
1
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc-4.2-2.5 fails to build from source on arm: MACHO_DYNAMIC_NO_PIC_P undeclared
...find >>> few hours to give llvm-gcc a try. >>> 539496: There are no plans to support ARMv4 in LLVM. As for ToT ARM >>> builds of llvm-gcc (both for bare-metal arm-elf and normal >>> arm-none-linux-gnueabi triples) is broken due to two PRs: 4680, 4681 >>> 511721: I believe it should be fixed on ToT. >>> 518592: Sounds like compiler / linker problem, it's not LLVM >>> related at all >>> >>> -- >>> With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov >>> Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg Stat...