search for: 139842

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "139842".

Did you mean: 135842
2020 Mar 10
2
[RFC] Speculative Execution Side Effect Suppression for Mitigating Load Value Injection
...is for experimentation and may not be production ready. We are open to upstreaming this pass if there is interest from the community. It can be removed if it becomes a maintenance burden. Intel has also created a mitigation that they have shared: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-March/139842.html We look forward to sharing information and ideas about both. The documentation in this email lists the performance I saw for variants of the mitigation that are potential optimizations for Load Value Injection. The flags can be used to turn on optimization techniques for different builds. Th...
2020 Mar 20
2
[RFC] Speculative Execution Side Effect Suppression for Mitigating Load Value Injection
...cerns about upstreaming > it? > - https://reviews.llvm.org/D75939 > - Should Scott's approach be upstreamed? Are there any concerns > about upstreaming it? > - https://reviews.llvm.org/D75937 > - http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-March/139842.html > - Are there reasons to upstream both approaches? > - Are there reasons against upstreaming both approaches? > > I'm particularly interested in hearing from folks who may use one of these > mitigations. > > For example, Jethro from Fortanix provided feedback...
2020 Mar 25
2
[RFC] Speculative Execution Side Effect Suppression for Mitigating Load Value Injection
...>> - https://reviews.llvm.org/D75939 >>> - Should Scott's approach be upstreamed? Are there any concerns >>> about upstreaming it? >>> - https://reviews.llvm.org/D75937 >>> - http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-March/139842.html >>> - Are there reasons to upstream both approaches? >>> - Are there reasons against upstreaming both approaches? >>> >>> I'm particularly interested in hearing from folks who may use one of >>> these mitigations. >>> >>&...