search for: 0.000019

According to this bugzilla entry, bug 6870 has been fixed as of at least version 3.5: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6870 However, I assert that it is present in 4.2.10, which ships with Debian Jessie. On my home network (IPv4 and IPv6), a box with Samba 4.2.10 with IPv6 disabled (via sysctl), will fail to contact a DC because the IPv6 connect fails immediately before the v4

I have a problem with some messages passed from exim to dovecot lmtp service: From exim debug: using socket /var/run/dovecot/lmtp LMTP<< 220 mbox8 ready

Hai, Did you check if ifconfig still shows ipv6 adresses. ( even ::1 ) Can you check that. I have several with ipv6 on and severel only ipv4. As of 4.1.17+ i didnt see this happing here. Now on 4.4.5 I think you have forgotten something. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rebecca Gellman > via samba

Hi, So I did some digging into the source code, and I think I've found the issue. Around line 120 of source3/libads/cldap.c: for (i=0; i<num_servers; i++) { NTSTATUS status; status = cldap_socket_init(state->cldap, NULL, /* local_addr */ state->servers[i], &state->cldap[i]); if (tevent_req_nterror(req, status)) { return tevent_req_post(req, ev);

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:13:08PM +0100, Rebecca Gellman via samba wrote: > > > Hi, > > So I did some digging into the source code, and I think I've found the > issue. Around line 120 of source3/libads/cldap.c: > > for (i=0; i<num_servers; i++) { > NTSTATUS status; > > status = cldap_socket_init(state->cldap, > NULL, /* local_addr */

Dear all, When I debugged the execution performance of an application using strace, I found there are some system calls like open and stat64 which run faster on XenLinux than the standard Linux. The following is the output of running "strace -c /bin/sh -c /bin/echo foo" on both systems. An open call runs averagely 109 usec on standard Linux but only 41 usecs on XenLinux. An stat64

On Thursday 22 of March 2018, Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz wrote: > I have a problem with some messages passed from exim to dovecot lmtp > service: > > From exim debug: > > using socket /var/run/dovecot/lmtp > LMTP<< 220 mbox8 ready > LMTP>> LHLO mbox8... > LMTP<< 250-mbox8 > LMTP<< 250-STARTTLS > LMTP<< 250-8BITMIME >

I'm working with a company who is running into an issue occasionally with their app running CentOS 6 on an NFS mount. The problem is essentially that, from a single CentOS 6 client, the client sometimes gets the wrong file size back from a stat() call. The problem specifically seems to happen after mmap and ftruncate calls. The former envionrment for the application was CentOS 4 where is

On 18/09/17 17:23, Ben Turner wrote: > Do you want tuned or untuned? If tuned I'd like to try one of my tunings for metadata, but I will use yours if you want. (Re-CC'd list) I would be interested in both, if possible: To confirm that it's not only my machines that exhibit this behaviour given my settings, and to see what can be achieved with your tuned settings. Thank you!

On 23.03.2018 10:04, Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz wrote: > On Thursday 22 of March 2018, Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz wrote: >> I have a problem with some messages passed from exim to dovecot lmtp >> service: >> >> From exim debug: >> >> using socket /var/run/dovecot/lmtp >> LMTP<< 220 mbox8 ready >> LMTP>> LHLO mbox8... >> LMTP<<

Hello! When I'm using qBittorrent [1] on Windows 10 with download location set to remote Samba share on Arch Linux then it severely affects all shares on that host, unrelated to disk where qBittorrent is actually writing. On Arch Linux that smbd process is using 100% of one CPU core time and seems it's blocking because of lseek calls. strace shows full of lseek(47, 1420820480,

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1950 Bug #: 1950 Summary: sshd tries to bind over and over to ::1 for several seconds Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.9p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

Mandi! Andrew Bartlett via samba In chel di` si favelave... Ok, i coma back to an old thread, because vendor finally reply. Little fast-rewind: i own some Konica-Minolta BizHub multifunction printers/copiers, and i need to ''bind'' it to my new AD domain. But authentication does not work, seems bacause that printer try to use SASL over plain LDAP (no SSL nor TLS). After

Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... > I think that is what Andrew is trying to tell you, the printer needs to > support SASL over TLS/SSL or it will never work. I don't think there is > anything you can do, but I am surprised that the print doesn't already > support it, after all, it isn't something new ;-) Mi confusion grow. ;-) As stated in my

On Thu, 2018-05-10 at 15:48 +0200, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote: > Mandi! Andrew Bartlett via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > > Ok, i coma back to an old thread, because vendor finally reply. Thanks! > > Little fast-rewind: i own some Konica-Minolta BizHub multifunction > printers/copiers, and i need to ''bind'' it to my new AD domain. > >

Mandi! Andrew Bartlett via samba In chel di` si favelave... > > There's some way to ''tight'' that configuration , eg permit 'ldap server require strong auth = > > no' only by some hosts? > > Or some other smb.conf options that i've missed? > Nothing at this stage. Ok. > The issue is that they need to do fully signed or sealed Kerberos

to my knowlidge, konica = xerox. and this works fine imo but im not able to look this up now. i did have xerox connected to my ldapS addc’s. i can check this monday. Greetz, Louis > Op 11 mei 2018 om 04:09 heeft Andrew Bartlett via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> het volgende geschreven: > >> On Thu, 2018-05-10 at 15:48 +0200, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote: >> Mandi!

Dear Samba users, here is an Ubuntu 14.04, with Samba 4 (4.1.6), and LDAP (slapd 2.4.31). The config came from a previous system (Debian Squeezy), which had been crashed (HW error - on this new machine, I've put Ubuntu). So, as I wrote, the smb.conf and LDAP database was copied from the backup from the old system - but it works as well. Only one thing what's very annoying. The Samba is

Mandi! Andrew Bartlett via samba In chel di` si favelave... > > This mean that the printer try to auth in LDAP 'plain' (no SSL, no > > TLS), and so samba refuse that? > No, it means that Samba is refusing to accept a NTLM or Kerberos > authenticated connection without SIGN or SEAL negotiated, as an > attacker could take over an unprotected network connection and do

Hi, I'm using py-rrdtool 0.2.1 with rrdtool 1.3.0 under 7.0-STABLE, and there's a couple of things about this new version of rrdtool that hurt performance under FreeBSD, but apparently help on whatever they tested on. For every update, the database file is opened, mapped into memory, madvise() is called, contents are modified, msync() is called, and the file is unmapped and closed: