Hi Neo
I installed the samba 3.0.23.d, because I thought that it is a
"""""stable
version""""", but the problem continued.
Same error, same problem: "smbd/sesssetup.c:setup_new_vc_session()
setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would ".
I tried to use your command: "/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -V Version 2.2.08a
from 3.0.23d" and the command " /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -v Version
2.2.08a from 3.0.23d", but both didn?t work too.
I tried to modify parameters of windows 2003 (using regedit), following
documents that I found in the WEB. Also he didn?t work.
So, I beg the "teams of the samba development" to help US,
because,sincerely, this is one bug, that needs more attention.
Alexandre Salom?
-----Mensagem original-----
De: lists@spacerat.ch [mailto:lists@spacerat.ch]
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 22 de novembro de 2006 12:46
Para: SALOME Alexandre
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Assunto: Re: [Samba] Acess windows 2003 to samba 3.0.10
Hi Alexandre
We had a similar problem yesterday on Solaris 9 8/03. After patching this
weekend, the w2k clients had no longer acces to the samba shares. Connect
failed with
C:\>net view \\server
System error 50 has occurred.
The request is not supported.
We've solved the problem by re downgrading to:
root@server:/var/samba/log # /usr/local/samba/bin/smbd -V Version 2.2.8a
from 3.0.21b
Now every works just as expected.
HTH
Neo
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:46:33 -0200, SALOME Alexandre
<alexandre.salome@comau.com.br> wrote:>
> Hi ,
> I have installed the samba the 3.0.10 in solaris 9. using computers
> with Windows XP is ok, but using computers with "windows Server Ent.
> 2003" do not have access in the areas shared of the samba.
> What I can make to correct this situation? Look logs below:
>
> [2006/11/21 08:04:20, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(324)
> Allowed connection from (172.18.150.12)
> [2006/11/21 08:04:20, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(324)
> Allowed connection from (172.18.150.12)
> [2006/11/21 08:04:20, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(235)
> [2006/11/21 08:04:20, 2] smbd/sesssetup.c:setup_new_vc_session(608)
> netbios connect: name1=COMAUB01 name2=COMAUB02
> setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would
> close all old resources.
> [2006/11/21 08:04:20, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(242)
> netbios connect: local=comaub01 remote=comaub02, name type = 0
> [2006/11/21 08:04:20, 2] smbd/sesssetup.c:setup_new_vc_session(608)
> setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would
> close all old resources.
> [2006/11/21 08:04:20, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(571)
> Closing connections
> [2006/11/21 08:04:20, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(324)
> Allowed connection from (172.18.150.12)
> [2006/11/21 08:04:20, 2] smbd/sesssetup.c:setup_new_vc_session(608)
> setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would
> close all old resources.
> [2006/11/21 08:04:20, 2] smbd/sesssetup.c:setup_new_vc_session(608)
> setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would
> close all old resources.
> [2006/11/21 08:04:20, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(571)
> Closing connections
> [2006/11/21 08:04:20, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(324)
> Allowed connection from (172.18.150.12)
> [2006/11/21 08:04:20, 2] smbd/sesssetup.c:setup_new_vc_session(608)
> setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would
> close all old resources.
> [2006/11/21 08:04:20, 2] smbd/sesssetup.c:setup_new_vc_session(608)
> setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would
> close all old resources.
> [2006/11/21 08:04:20, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(571)
> Closing connections
> [2006/11/21 08:04:20, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(324)
> Allowed connection from (172.18.150.12)
> [2006/11/21 08:04:20, 2] smbd/sesssetup.c:setup_new_vc_session(608)
> setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would
> close all old resources.
> [2006/11/21 08:04:20, 2] smbd/sesssetup.c:setup_new_vc_session(608)
> setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would
> close all old resources.
> [2006/11/21 08:04:20, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(571)
> Closing connections
>
> Thank?s
> Alexandre Salom?
>
