I'm in a bit of a pickle, and I need some help. I'm forced to disable netbios on any machine that leaves the company because of how MS Exchange works over a VPN. I have Samba 2.x on two Compaq Tru64 5.x machines, each with one (public) share. With netbios enabled, the client machines can access the share with no issues. With netbios disabled, I get something like "No network provider accepted the given network path." DNS is working fine - the clients resolve the Samba machines, and the Samba machines resolve the clients. I've tried stabbing at the config a few times with things like the dns proxy setting, wins proxy, wins server, security type, etc. - no luck. I have absolutely no problem with accessing my Samba 3 system from a client with netbios disabled. Anybody know what this might be? Thanks, Nate PS - Actually, I'd love to install Samba 3 on these two problem systems, but it won't compile. :/
On Fri, 2004-10-15 at 11:30 -0700, Nate Schindler wrote:> I'm in a bit of a pickle, and I need some help. > > I'm forced to disable netbios on any machine that leaves the company because of how MS Exchange works over a VPN. > I have Samba 2.x on two Compaq Tru64 5.x machines, each with one (public) share. > > With netbios enabled, the client machines can access the share with no issues. With netbios disabled, I get something like "No network provider accepted the given network path."I don't think Samba 2 supported DNS resolution. IIRC it requires NetBIOS Name Resolution in order to correctly resolve. Can you go direct to the IP?
> -----Original Message----- > From: Aaron Grewell [mailto:agrewell@uwb.edu] > Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 11:36 AM > To: Nate Schindler > Cc: samba@lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: [Samba] NetBios problem with Samba 2.x > > > On Fri, 2004-10-15 at 11:30 -0700, Nate Schindler wrote: > > I'm in a bit of a pickle, and I need some help. > > > > I'm forced to disable netbios on any machine that leaves > the company because of how MS Exchange works over a VPN. > > I have Samba 2.x on two Compaq Tru64 5.x machines, each > with one (public) share. > > > > With netbios enabled, the client machines can access the > share with no issues. With netbios disabled, I get something > like "No network provider accepted the given network path." > > > I don't think Samba 2 supported DNS resolution. IIRC it requires > NetBIOS Name Resolution in order to correctly resolve. Can you go > direct to the IP? >No, I get the same error. So I guess I should look into the compile problems with samba 3 again... Thanks :)
> -----Original Message----- > From: Fernando Ribeiro [mailto:musb@nerdgroup.org] > Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 11:54 AM > To: Aaron Grewell > Cc: Nate Schindler; samba@lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: [Samba] NetBios problem with Samba 2.x> > > > I don't think Samba 2 supported DNS resolution. IIRC it requires > > NetBIOS Name Resolution in order to correctly resolve. Can you go > > direct to the IP? > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > > > > Hi, > > I have same problem with samba 3.0.7 :-( >Well that's interesting... I don't. Can you send your smb.conf? What operating system is samba running on?> Thanks > > -- > Fernando Ribeiro - GPG-KEY: 0x8D7255F4 > Linux Counter: #273768 - ICQ: 175630330 > LPIC-2 - Advanced Linux > Death the graph! Death the mouse > Death patents! Death closed standards! > http://www.nerdgroup.org > http://musb.nerdgroup.org > -------------------------------------- > "Grandes mentes discutem id?ias; > Mentes medianas discutem eventos; > Mentes pequenas discutem pessoas." >
> -----Original Message----- > From: Fernando Ribeiro [mailto:musb@nerdgroup.org] > Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 11:54 AM > To: Aaron Grewell > Cc: Nate Schindler; samba@lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: [Samba] NetBios problem with Samba 2.x > > > Palavras de Aaron Grewell [Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 11:35:52AM -0700]: > > On Fri, 2004-10-15 at 11:30 -0700, Nate Schindler wrote: > > > I'm in a bit of a pickle, and I need some help. > > > > > > I'm forced to disable netbios on any machine that leaves > the company because of how MS Exchange works over a VPN. > > > I have Samba 2.x on two Compaq Tru64 5.x machines, each > with one (public) share. > > > > > > With netbios enabled, the client machines can access the > share with no issues. With netbios disabled, I get something > like "No network provider accepted the given network path." > > > > > > I don't think Samba 2 supported DNS resolution. IIRC it requires > > NetBIOS Name Resolution in order to correctly resolve. Can you go > > direct to the IP? > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > > > > Hi, > > I have same problem with samba 3.0.7 :-( > > ThanksI gave 3.0.x another shot, and although I had a lot of warnings, 3.0.7 did compile. With netbios disabled on the windows client, the share *does* load now. (yay!)> > -- > Fernando Ribeiro - GPG-KEY: 0x8D7255F4 > Linux Counter: #273768 - ICQ: 175630330 > LPIC-2 - Advanced Linux > Death the graph! Death the mouse > Death patents! Death closed standards! > http://www.nerdgroup.org > http://musb.nerdgroup.org > -------------------------------------- > "Grandes mentes discutem id?ias; > Mentes medianas discutem eventos; > Mentes pequenas discutem pessoas." >
Reasonably Related Threads
- getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected
- smbldap-tools don't create machine account properlly
- "getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected", don't solve?
- netbios name failure, wins problem?
- Variable interpolation challenge