[rspec-users] Patch idea for rspec_on_rails

Jerrett Taylor
2007-10-19T20:03:55Z

We have a similar one, which works like:


Foo.should have_association(:has_many, :conditions => "stuff",
:through
=> :bazes)

we started off with should have_many  etc, but it became overcomplicated
with all the various things that you may want - so we changed to
have_association to make it simpler and ensure it will work with any/all
association options

http://pastie.caboo.se/108976





Russell Norris wrote:
> I recently wrote a matcher for testing AR associations which allows
> you to specify things like:
>
>     Foo.should have_many(:bars).through(:bazes)
>
> I''m pretty darned proud of it and a couple of people have
suggested
> that I should submit it to the rspec_on_rails project. Before I go to
> the trouble of writing out rdoc and fully spec''ing it, I just
wanted
> to make sure this was something the community would like.
>
> Instead of pasting in the code into the email, I thought I''d just
make
> a pastie and let those interested read it there:
> http://pastie.caboo.se/108922
>
> I think it would make a nice addition to the current Rails matchers.
> Here''s hoping you do too.
>
> RSL