[rspec-users] Controller/View User Agent Strings

s.ross
Wed, 14 Feb 2007 01:22:05 -0000

Just checking. I guess it just seemed too easy :)

What happens when this page renders is a tag like:



Or something like that with the Rails asset tagging. What I want to
do is test that I''m responding to the user agent string correctly
using a matcher that looks for the filename, but disregards the asset
tag:

response.should have_tag(''link'', :attributes => {:href
=> /
application.css/})
response.should_not have_tag(''link'', :attributes => {:href
=> /ie.css/})

However, the "should have" expectations always pass no matter what.
Not coincidentally, the "should_not have" ones always fail.

I can see, looking at the Rails plugin source that my syntax is
broken and that the have_tag expectation was meant more to determine
whether the tag exists and how many times it occurs. Is there a
matcher that peers into the tag the way the old Test::Unit assertions
did?

Thanks

On Feb 13, 2007, at 4:40 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:

> On 2/13/07, s.ross <cwdinfo at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I have conditional logic in my view (I know, obligatory slap on the
>> wrist) so that an add-on stylesheet is linked in for IE users. The
>> code is:
>>
>>      <%= stylesheet_link_tag(''ie'', :media =>
''screen'') if
>> request.user_agent && request.user_agent =~ /msie/i %>
>>
>> The spec is:
>>
>>    specify "should display index page" do
>>      get :index
>>      response.should_be_success
>>    end
>>
>> There is no user_agent in the request object passed to the view. Now,
>> I can change all of this by simply:
>>
>> setup do
>>      request.stub!(:user_agent).and_return(''msie'')
>> end
>>
>> but I was wondering if there was a better way?
>
> That seems pretty simple to me. What is bugging you about it?
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Steve
>> _______________________________________________
>> rspec-users mailing list
>> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>>