Re: Re: Rails'' inflections are messy

davidcelis
Fri, 27 Jul 2012 00:17:32 -0000

Any thoughts on this from core members, perhaps?

On Friday, July 20, 2012 10:25:20 AM UTC-7, davidcelis
wrote:
>
> Yep, the point I''ve been getting at. People shouldn''t
blindly upgrade
> their Rails versions anyway, and when they see errors that a Controller
> can''t be found based on their Model name or vice versa, it should
be pretty
> obvious as to what''s going on unless they''re clueless
about the inflector.
>
> On Thursday, July 19, 2012 1:01:29 PM UTC-7, pavling wrote:
>>
>> On 19 July 2012 20:48, Colin Law
<clanlaw-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> > On 19 July 2012 20:07, Linus Pettersson
<linus.pettersson-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>> wrote:
>> >> At least they should fix the ones that are incorrect...
>> >>
>> >> "Octopus".pluralize should return
"Octopuses" and NOT "Octopi"... :)
>> >
>> > But then all those applications that rely on the current
pluralisation
>> > of octopus would break when upgraded.  Innumerable applications
around
>> > the internet would come to their knees.
>>
>> :-)
>>
>> Surely all those sites'' developers could just override the
inflector
>> back to what it used to be, and get on with all the other tasks they
>> need to complete to upgrade to Rails4?
>>
>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit