Re: Re: Background Job

Bill Walton
Thu, 12 Aug 2010 13:14:05 -0000

On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 8:06 AM, Fernando Perez
<lists-fsXkhYbjdPsEEoCn2XhGlw@public.gmane.org>
wrote:
>> It''s working quite well for us.  The persistent queue was the
most
>> important aspect for me.
>
> Hi Bill, thanks for your feedback. Did you also consider delayed_job?
> It''s a tie between the two of them.

I did, though I cannot remember at the moment exactly what caused me
to pick Bj.  I think it may have been the Engine Yard recommendation.
Then there''s the fact that Ara wrote it and he''s well regarded
in the
Ruby community.  Or maybe it was that I though a Bj sounded like more
fun than a delayed_job ;-)

Best regards,
Bill

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.