Hello, I''m using OS X leopard and Rails 2.3.2 I''ve installed ruby by downloading the source and compiling it. Now, I have ruby -v 1.8.6 ruby19 -v 1.9 How can I get ruby19 to replace ruby ? Also, when I do ruby19 script/server, I get the following error : Missing the Rails 2.3.2 gem. Any Ideas ? Thank you. -VS. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Frederick Cheung
2009-Mar-16 23:17 UTC
Re: installed ruby ver 1.9 but not working with rails 2.3.2
On Mar 16, 10:11 pm, VS <vsro...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> Hello, > > I''m using OS X leopard and Rails 2.3.2 > > I''ve installed ruby by downloading the source and compiling it. > > Now, I have > > ruby -v > 1.8.6 > ruby19 -v > 1.91.9 is several months old. You almost certainly want 1.9.1 Fred> > How can I get ruby19 to replace ruby ? > > Also, when I do ruby19 script/server, I get the following error : > Missing the Rails 2.3.2 gem. > > Any Ideas ? > > Thank you. > -VS.--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Greg Donald
2009-Mar-16 23:29 UTC
Re: installed ruby ver 1.9 but not working with rails 2.3.2
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:11 PM, VS <vsroses-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> How can I get ruby19 to replace ruby ?You can create a link from the ruby19 to the current ruby. `which ruby` will tell you the path to the current ruby. I''ll pretend it said "/usr/bin/ruby". Move the current ruby someplace else. mv /usr/bin/ruby /some/place/else `which ruby19` will tell you the path to the ruby19. Add a link: ln -s /path/to/ruby19 /usr/bin/ruby -- Greg Donald http://destiney.com/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Thanks Greg. Now when I do ruby -v, I get ruby 1.9.1p0 (2009-01-30 revision 21907) [i386-darwin9.6.0] But when I run script/server in my rails directory, I get : Missing the Rails 2.3.2 gem. Any ideas ? Thanks so much, -VS On Mar 16, 4:29 pm, Greg Donald <gdon...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:11 PM, VS <vsro...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > How can I get ruby19 to replace ruby ? > > You can create a link from the ruby19 to the current ruby. > > `which ruby` will tell you the path to the current ruby. I''ll pretend > it said "/usr/bin/ruby". > > Move the current ruby someplace else. > > mv /usr/bin/ruby /some/place/else > > `which ruby19` will tell you the path to the ruby19. > > Add a link: > > ln -s /path/to/ruby19 /usr/bin/ruby > > -- > Greg Donaldhttp://destiney.com/--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Conrad Taylor
2009-Mar-17 00:45 UTC
Re: installed ruby ver 1.9 but not working with rails 2.3.2
Hi, you''ll need to execute gem install rails Good luck, -Conrad On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:19 PM, VS <vsroses-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > Thanks Greg. > > Now when I do ruby -v, I get > ruby 1.9.1p0 (2009-01-30 revision 21907) [i386-darwin9.6.0] > > But when I run script/server in my rails directory, I get : > Missing the Rails 2.3.2 gem. > > Any ideas ? > > Thanks so much, > -VS > > On Mar 16, 4:29 pm, Greg Donald <gdon...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:11 PM, VS <vsro...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > How can I get ruby19 to replace ruby ? > > > > You can create a link from the ruby19 to the current ruby. > > > > `which ruby` will tell you the path to the current ruby. I''ll pretend > > it said "/usr/bin/ruby". > > > > Move the current ruby someplace else. > > > > mv /usr/bin/ruby /some/place/else > > > > `which ruby19` will tell you the path to the ruby19. > > > > Add a link: > > > > ln -s /path/to/ruby19 /usr/bin/ruby > > > > -- > > Greg Donaldhttp://destiney.com/ > > >--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Thanks Conrad. I''ve already done that... When I do ''gem install rails'', I get : Successfully installed rails-2.3.2 1 gem installed Now, when I go to the rails project directory and do ''script/server'', I still get : Missing the Rails 2.3.2 gem. It''s really frustrating.. Any Ideas ?? Thank you. -VS. On Mar 16, 5:45 pm, Conrad Taylor <conra...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> Hi, you''ll need to execute > gem install rails > > Good luck, > > -Conrad > > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:19 PM, VS <vsro...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > Thanks Greg. > > > Now when I do ruby -v, I get > > ruby 1.9.1p0 (2009-01-30 revision 21907) [i386-darwin9.6.0] > > > But when I run script/server in my rails directory, I get : > > Missing the Rails 2.3.2 gem. > > > Any ideas ? > > > Thanks so much, > > -VS > > > On Mar 16, 4:29 pm, Greg Donald <gdon...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:11 PM, VS <vsro...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > > How can I get ruby19 to replace ruby ? > > > > You can create a link from the ruby19 to the current ruby. > > > > `which ruby` will tell you the path to the current ruby. I''ll pretend > > > it said "/usr/bin/ruby". > > > > Move the current ruby someplace else. > > > > mv /usr/bin/ruby /some/place/else > > > > `which ruby19` will tell you the path to the ruby19. > > > > Add a link: > > > > ln -s /path/to/ruby19 /usr/bin/ruby > > > > -- > > > Greg Donaldhttp://destiney.com/--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Greg Donald
2009-Mar-17 01:13 UTC
Re: installed ruby ver 1.9 but not working with rails 2.3.2
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 7:52 PM, VS <vsroses-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > Thanks Conrad. I''ve already done that... > > When I do ''gem install rails'', I get : > Successfully installed rails-2.3.2 > 1 gem installed > > Now, when I go to the rails project directory and do ''script/server'', > I still get : > Missing the Rails 2.3.2 gem. > > It''s really frustrating.. Any Ideas ??What''s your script/server look like? Can you run script/console without issue? -- Greg Donald http://destiney.com/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Yes, I get the same error on script/console. Here''s my script/server #!/usr/bin/env ruby require File.dirname(__FILE__) + ''/../config/boot'' require ''commands/server'' Thank you. -VS On Mar 16, 6:13 pm, Greg Donald <gdon...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 7:52 PM, VS <vsro...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > Thanks Conrad. I''ve already done that... > > > When I do ''gem install rails'', I get : > > Successfully installed rails-2.3.2 > > 1 gem installed > > > Now, when I go to the rails project directory and do ''script/server'', > > I still get : > > Missing the Rails 2.3.2 gem. > > > It''s really frustrating.. Any Ideas ?? > > What''s your script/server look like? > > Can you run script/console without issue? > > -- > Greg Donaldhttp://destiney.com/--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Greg Donald
2009-Mar-17 02:04 UTC
Re: installed ruby ver 1.9 but not working with rails 2.3.2
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:18 PM, VS <vsroses-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > Yes, I get the same error on script/console. Here''s my script/server > #!/usr/bin/env ruby > require File.dirname(__FILE__) + ''/../config/boot'' > require ''commands/server'' > > Thank you. > -VSLooks normal to me. What RAILS_GEM_VERSION is in your config/environment.rb ? -- Greg Donald http://destiney.com/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Thanks Greg. Here''s the line from config/environment.rb RAILS_GEM_VERSION = ''2.3.2'' unless defined? RAILS_GEM_VERSION Any ideas ? this is driving me crazy... Everything was working under ruby 1.8.6 Thanks, -VS On Mar 16, 7:04 pm, Greg Donald <gdon...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:18 PM, VS <vsro...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > Yes, I get the same error on script/console. Here''s my script/server > > #!/usr/bin/env ruby > > require File.dirname(__FILE__) + ''/../config/boot'' > > require ''commands/server'' > > > Thank you. > > -VS > > Looks normal to me. > > What RAILS_GEM_VERSION is in your config/environment.rb ? > > -- > Greg Donaldhttp://destiney.com/--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
This might mean something... When I run ''gem install rails'' as the local user( in the previous attempt I ran this as root), I get WARNING: Installing to ~/.gem since /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8 and /usr/bin aren''t both writable. WARNING: You don''t have /Users/vs/.gem/ruby/1.8/bin in your PATH, gem executables will not run. Any ideas ? Thank you. -VS On Mar 16, 7:16 pm, VS <vsro...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> Thanks Greg. Here''s the line from config/environment.rb > RAILS_GEM_VERSION = ''2.3.2'' unless defined? RAILS_GEM_VERSION > > Any ideas ? this is driving me crazy... Everything was working under > ruby 1.8.6 > > Thanks, > -VS > On Mar 16, 7:04 pm, Greg Donald <gdon...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:18 PM, VS <vsro...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > > Yes, I get the same error on script/console. Here''s my script/server > > > #!/usr/bin/env ruby > > > require File.dirname(__FILE__) + ''/../config/boot'' > > > require ''commands/server'' > > > > Thank you. > > > -VS > > > Looks normal to me. > > > What RAILS_GEM_VERSION is in your config/environment.rb ? > > > -- > > Greg Donaldhttp://destiney.com/--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
update: if I do "sudo gem install rails", I get : Successfully installed rails-2.3.2 1 gem installed But if I do script/server: I still get: Missing the Rails 2.3.2 gem What am I missing ? Thanks, -VS On Mar 16, 7:20 pm, VS <vsro...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> This might mean something... When I run ''gem install rails'' as the > local user( in the previous attempt I ran this as root), I get > WARNING: Installing to ~/.gem since /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8 and > /usr/bin aren''t both writable. > WARNING: You don''t have /Users/vs/.gem/ruby/1.8/bin in your PATH, > gem executables will not run. > > Any ideas ? > > Thank you. > -VS > > On Mar 16, 7:16 pm, VS <vsro...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > > > Thanks Greg. Here''s the line from config/environment.rb > > RAILS_GEM_VERSION = ''2.3.2'' unless defined? RAILS_GEM_VERSION > > > Any ideas ? this is driving me crazy... Everything was working under > > ruby 1.8.6 > > > Thanks, > > -VS > > On Mar 16, 7:04 pm, Greg Donald <gdon...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:18 PM, VS <vsro...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > > > Yes, I get the same error on script/console. Here''s my script/server > > > > #!/usr/bin/env ruby > > > > require File.dirname(__FILE__) + ''/../config/boot'' > > > > require ''commands/server'' > > > > > Thank you. > > > > -VS > > > > Looks normal to me. > > > > What RAILS_GEM_VERSION is in your config/environment.rb ? > > > > -- > > > Greg Donaldhttp://destiney.com/--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
This is definetely working with ruby 1.8.6. Here''s the output using the old version of ruby : oldruby script/server => Booting Mongrel => Rails 2.3.2 application starting on http://0.0.0.0:3000 => Call with -d to detach => Ctrl-C to shutdown server But when I try : ruby script/server, Missing the Rails 2.3.2 gem Error has to do with ruby 1.9.1p0 Thanks, -VS On Mar 16, 7:27 pm, VS <vsro...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> update: if I do "sudo gem install rails", I get : > Successfully installed rails-2.3.2 > 1 gem installed > > But if I do script/server: I still get: > Missing the Rails 2.3.2 gem > > What am I missing ? > > Thanks, > -VS > > On Mar 16, 7:20 pm, VS <vsro...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > > > This might mean something... When I run ''gem install rails'' as the > > local user( in the previous attempt I ran this as root), I get > > WARNING: Installing to ~/.gem since /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8 and > > /usr/bin aren''t both writable. > > WARNING: You don''t have /Users/vs/.gem/ruby/1.8/bin in your PATH, > > gem executables will not run. > > > Any ideas ? > > > Thank you. > > -VS > > > On Mar 16, 7:16 pm, VS <vsro...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > > Thanks Greg. Here''s the line from config/environment.rb > > > RAILS_GEM_VERSION = ''2.3.2'' unless defined? RAILS_GEM_VERSION > > > > Any ideas ? this is driving me crazy... Everything was working under > > > ruby 1.8.6 > > > > Thanks, > > > -VS > > > On Mar 16, 7:04 pm, Greg Donald <gdon...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:18 PM, VS <vsro...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > > > > Yes, I get the same error on script/console. Here''s my script/server > > > > > #!/usr/bin/env ruby > > > > > require File.dirname(__FILE__) + ''/../config/boot'' > > > > > require ''commands/server'' > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > -VS > > > > > Looks normal to me. > > > > > What RAILS_GEM_VERSION is in your config/environment.rb ? > > > > > -- > > > > Greg Donaldhttp://destiney.com/--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
When you built ruby 1.9.1 from source, did you go all the way to make
install? If so, what was the root (config --prefix=/???) that you
gave prior to the initial make?
I''ve found that just linking in the executable with major releases of
anything is often the shortest path to disfunction.
Here''s a sequence you could use to build a parallel RoR suite.
1) Identify a new root for your RoR install suite like: /opt/RoR.
Create that directory and make yourself be owner (so you won''t need to
sudo all the time).
2) In your Ruby source directory type:
2a) ./configure --prefix=/opt/RoR
2b) make
2c) make install
You''ll now have /opt/RoR/bin, /opt/RoR/lib, ... with your new ruby in
place.
3) In a term window type:
3a) PATH=/opt/RoR/bin:$PATH
3b) ruby --version You should see something like:
ruby 1.9.1p0 (2009-01-30 revision 21907) [powerpc-darwin9.6.0]
3c) gem install rake rack
3d) gem install rails
Now you''ve got a new RoR suite that''s available if your path
is
modified as in step 3a, else you''ve got your original RoR setup
(assuming you haven''t already blown it away).
Rick
On Mar 16, 4:32 pm, VS <vsro...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
wrote:> This is definetely working with ruby 1.8.6. Here''s the output
using
> the old version of ruby :
> oldruby script/server
> => Booting Mongrel
> => Rails 2.3.2 application starting onhttp://0.0.0.0:3000
> => Call with -d to detach
> => Ctrl-C to shutdown server
>
> But when I try :
> ruby script/server,
> Missing the Rails 2.3.2 gem
>
> Error has to do with ruby 1.9.1p0
>
> Thanks,
> -VS
>
> On Mar 16, 7:27 pm, VS
<vsro...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> > update: if I do "sudo gem install rails", I get :
> > Successfully installed rails-2.3.2
> > 1 gem installed
>
> > But if I do script/server: I still get:
> > Missing the Rails 2.3.2 gem
>
> > What am I missing ?
>
> > Thanks,
> > -VS
>
> > On Mar 16, 7:20 pm, VS
<vsro...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> > > This might mean something... When I run ''gem install
rails'' as the
> > > local user( in the previous attempt I ran this as root), I get
> > > WARNING: Installing to ~/.gem since /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8 and
> > > /usr/bin aren''t both writable.
> > > WARNING: You don''t have /Users/vs/.gem/ruby/1.8/bin in
your PATH,
> > > gem executables will not run.
>
> > > Any ideas ?
>
> > > Thank you.
> > > -VS
>
> > > On Mar 16, 7:16 pm, VS
<vsro...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> > > > Thanks Greg. Here''s the line from
config/environment.rb
> > > > RAILS_GEM_VERSION = ''2.3.2'' unless
defined? RAILS_GEM_VERSION
>
> > > > Any ideas ? this is driving me crazy... Everything was
working under
> > > > ruby 1.8.6
>
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > -VS
> > > > On Mar 16, 7:04 pm, Greg Donald
<gdon...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:18 PM, VS
<vsro...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Yes, I get the same error on script/console.
Here''s my script/server
> > > > > > #!/usr/bin/env ruby
> > > > > > require File.dirname(__FILE__) +
''/../config/boot''
> > > > > > require ''commands/server''
>
> > > > > > Thank you.
> > > > > > -VS
>
> > > > > Looks normal to me.
>
> > > > > What RAILS_GEM_VERSION is in your config/environment.rb
?
>
> > > > > --
> > > > > Greg Donaldhttp://destiney.com/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Conrad Taylor
2009-Mar-17 04:12 UTC
Re: installed ruby ver 1.9 but not working with rails 2.3.2
Sent from my iPhone On Mar 16, 2009, at 7:27 PM, VS <vsroses-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > update: if I do "sudo gem install rails", I get : > Successfully installed rails-2.3.2 > 1 gem installed > > But if I do script/server: I still get: > Missing the Rails 2.3.2 gem > > What am I missing ? > > Thanks, > -VS > > > On Mar 16, 7:20 pm, VS <vsro...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: >> This might mean something... When I run ''gem install rails'' as the >> local user( in the previous attempt I ran this as root), I get >> WARNING: Installing to ~/.gem since /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8 and >> /usr/bin aren''t both writable. >> WARNING: You don''t have /Users/vs/.gem/ruby/1.8/bin in your PATH, >> gem executables will not run. >> >> Any ideas ? >> >> Thank you. >> -VS >> >> On Mar 16, 7:16 pm, VS <vsro...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Thanks Greg. Here''s the line from config/environment.rb >>> RAILS_GEM_VERSION = ''2.3.2'' unless defined? RAILS_GEM_VERSION >> >>> Any ideas ? this is driving me crazy... Everything was working >>> under >>> ruby 1.8.6 >> >>> Thanks, >>> -VS >>> On Mar 16, 7:04 pm, Greg Donald <gdon...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: >> >>>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:18 PM, VS <vsro...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: >> >>>>> Yes, I get the same error on script/console. Here''s my script/ >>>>> server >>>>> #!/usr/bin/env ruby >>>>> require File.dirname(__FILE__) + ''/../config/boot'' >>>>> require ''commands/server'' >> >>>>> Thank you. >>>>> -VS >> >>>> Looks normal to me. >> >>>> What RAILS_GEM_VERSION is in your config/environment.rb ? >> >>>> -- >>>> Greg Donaldhttp://destiney.com/Hi, is Rails being installed in the correct place? Also, you''ll need to install thin if you''re working with Rails 2.3.x and Ruby 1.9.1. Thus, you should be able to install it by doing the following: gem install thin Good luck, -Conrad>>>> > >--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Conrad Taylor
2009-Mar-17 05:25 UTC
Re: installed ruby ver 1.9 but not working with rails 2.3.2
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 7:32 PM, VS <vsroses-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > This is definetely working with ruby 1.8.6. Here''s the output using > the old version of ruby : > oldruby script/server > => Booting Mongrel > => Rails 2.3.2 application starting on http://0.0.0.0:3000 > => Call with -d to detach > => Ctrl-C to shutdown server > > But when I try : > ruby script/server, > Missing the Rails 2.3.2 gem > > Error has to do with ruby 1.9.1p0 > > Thanks, > -VS > > > > On Mar 16, 7:27 pm, VS <vsro...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > update: if I do "sudo gem install rails", I get : > > Successfully installed rails-2.3.2 > > 1 gem installed > > > > But if I do script/server: I still get: > > Missing the Rails 2.3.2 gem > > > > What am I missing ? > > > > Thanks, > > -VS > > > > On Mar 16, 7:20 pm, VS <vsro...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > This might mean something... When I run ''gem install rails'' as the > > > local user( in the previous attempt I ran this as root), I get > > > WARNING: Installing to ~/.gem since /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8 and > > > /usr/bin aren''t both writable. > > > WARNING: You don''t have /Users/vs/.gem/ruby/1.8/bin in your PATH, > > > gem executables will not run. > > > > > Any ideas ? > > > > > Thank you. > > > -VS > > > > > On Mar 16, 7:16 pm, VS <vsro...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > > > > Thanks Greg. Here''s the line from config/environment.rb > > > > RAILS_GEM_VERSION = ''2.3.2'' unless defined? RAILS_GEM_VERSION > > > > > > Any ideas ? this is driving me crazy... Everything was working under > > > > ruby 1.8.6 > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > -VS > > > > On Mar 16, 7:04 pm, Greg Donald <gdon...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:18 PM, VS <vsro...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > Yes, I get the same error on script/console. Here''s my > script/server > > > > > > #!/usr/bin/env ruby > > > > > > require File.dirname(__FILE__) + ''/../config/boot'' > > > > > > require ''commands/server'' > > > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > -VS > > > > > > > Looks normal to me. > > > > > > > What RAILS_GEM_VERSION is in your config/environment.rb ? > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Greg Donaldhttp://destiney.com/ >OK, here''s a chart that you should following: ( mongrel compatible ) ( thin compatible ) ( wberick compatible ) ( passenger compatible ) ruby 1.8.6 Y Y Y Y ruby 1.9.1 N Y N Y Good luck, -Conrad> <http://destiney.com/> > > >--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Frederick Cheung
2009-Mar-17 09:20 UTC
Re: installed ruby ver 1.9 but not working with rails 2.3.2
On Mar 17, 2:27 am, VS <vsro...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> update: if I do "sudo gem install rails", I get : > Successfully installed rails-2.3.2 > 1 gem installed > > But if I do script/server: I still get: > Missing the Rails 2.3.2 gem > > What am I missing ? >I bet that the gem executable is still the ruby 1.8 version (ie that installs gems for ruby 1.8). The one that installs for ruby 1.9 is probably called gem19 or something like that. Fred> Thanks, > -VS > > On Mar 16, 7:20 pm, VS <vsro...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > This might mean something... When I run ''gem install rails'' as the > > local user( in the previous attempt I ran this as root), I get > > WARNING: Installing to ~/.gem since /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8 and > > /usr/bin aren''t both writable. > > WARNING: You don''t have /Users/vs/.gem/ruby/1.8/bin in your PATH, > > gem executables will not run. > > > Any ideas ? > > > Thank you. > > -VS > > > On Mar 16, 7:16 pm, VS <vsro...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > > Thanks Greg. Here''s the line from config/environment.rb > > > RAILS_GEM_VERSION = ''2.3.2'' unless defined? RAILS_GEM_VERSION > > > > Any ideas ? this is driving me crazy... Everything was working under > > > ruby 1.8.6 > > > > Thanks, > > > -VS > > > On Mar 16, 7:04 pm, Greg Donald <gdon...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:18 PM, VS <vsro...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > > > > Yes, I get the same error on script/console. Here''s my script/server > > > > > #!/usr/bin/env ruby > > > > > require File.dirname(__FILE__) + ''/../config/boot'' > > > > > require ''commands/server'' > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > -VS > > > > > Looks normal to me. > > > > > What RAILS_GEM_VERSION is in your config/environment.rb ? > > > > > -- > > > > Greg Donaldhttp://destiney.com/--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
\"Wolas!\"
2009-Mar-17 09:21 UTC
Re: installed ruby ver 1.9 but not working with rails 2.3.2
When you followed gregs advice you ended up sort of "fooling" the ruby command. now you have two of everything (2 rails gems, one under 1.8 and one under 1.9). make sure you are calling the correct gem from the correct place. If i were you, i would uninstall one of your ruby instalations (at this point 1.8) On Mar 17, 1:19 am, VS <vsro...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> Thanks Greg. > > Now when I do ruby -v, I get > ruby 1.9.1p0 (2009-01-30 revision 21907) [i386-darwin9.6.0] > > But when I run script/server in my rails directory, I get : > Missing the Rails 2.3.2 gem. > > Any ideas ? > > Thanks so much, > -VS > > On Mar 16, 4:29 pm, Greg Donald <gdon...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:11 PM, VS <vsro...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > How can I get ruby19 to replace ruby ? > > > You can create a link from the ruby19 to the current ruby. > > > `which ruby` will tell you the path to the current ruby. I''ll pretend > > it said "/usr/bin/ruby". > > > Move the current ruby someplace else. > > > mv /usr/bin/ruby /some/place/else > > > `which ruby19` will tell you the path to the ruby19. > > > Add a link: > > > ln -s /path/to/ruby19 /usr/bin/ruby > > > -- > > Greg Donaldhttp://destiney.com/--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Nerdaniel
2009-Mar-17 15:10 UTC
Re: installed ruby ver 1.9 but not working with rails 2.3.2
sudo gem19 install rails? On Mar 17, 6:21 am, "\"Wolas!\"" <jcpen...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> When you followed gregs advice you ended up sort of "fooling" the ruby > command. now you have two of everything (2 rails gems, one under 1.8 > and one under 1.9). > > make sure you are calling the correct gem from the correct place. If i > were you, i would uninstall one of your ruby instalations (at this > point 1.8) > > On Mar 17, 1:19 am, VS <vsro...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > Thanks Greg. > > > Now when I do ruby -v, I get > > ruby 1.9.1p0 (2009-01-30 revision 21907) [i386-darwin9.6.0] > > > But when I run script/server in my rails directory, I get : > > Missing the Rails 2.3.2 gem. > > > Any ideas ? > > > Thanks so much, > > -VS > > > On Mar 16, 4:29 pm, Greg Donald <gdon...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:11 PM, VS <vsro...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > > How can I get ruby19 to replace ruby ? > > > > You can create a link from the ruby19 to the current ruby. > > > > `which ruby` will tell you the path to the current ruby. I''ll pretend > > > it said "/usr/bin/ruby". > > > > Move the current ruby someplace else. > > > > mv /usr/bin/ruby /some/place/else > > > > `which ruby19` will tell you the path to the ruby19. > > > > Add a link: > > > > ln -s /path/to/ruby19 /usr/bin/ruby > > > > -- > > > Greg Donaldhttp://destiney.com/--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Greg Donald
2009-Mar-17 15:47 UTC
Re: installed ruby ver 1.9 but not working with rails 2.3.2
2009/3/17 "Wolas!" <jcpenche-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>:> When you followed gregs advice you ended up sort of "fooling" the ruby > command. now you have two of everything (2 rails gems, one under 1.8 > and one under 1.9).There''s no such thing as a "ruby command" (at least not in my shell). There is a ruby binary, and there''s a path that might find it depending on where you put it and what directories your path contains. Being able to change the path so it can find a different ruby binary other than the one that came with the system is a feature of the system, seriously.. no fooling. You can have your entire ruby toolchain living out of /some/place/weird while completely ignoring the ruby that came with the system, you only have to adjust the paths to include the weird place. That''s how it works, it''s not magic, no fooling.> make sure you are calling the correct gem from the correct place. If i > were you, i would uninstall one of your ruby instalations (at this > point 1.8)That''s all together not necessary. I suspect all of my development systems have two ruby installs. I ignore the one that came with the system and install my own whereever I want. I update my bashrc so it knows about my intentions and that''s about it. -- Greg Donald http://destiney.com/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
\"Wolas!\"
2009-Mar-20 09:35 UTC
Re: installed ruby ver 1.9 but not working with rails 2.3.2
Thanks for the lesson greg. Maybe i wasnt using the correct terminlogy, that having been done by years of explaining such concepts to people that dont know what binaries are and english not being my first language. Nevertheless, VS is using one version of ruby with one set of gems and running the other version which doesnt happen to have those set of gems, and this happened by following your advice. That is what i was trying to say. so, here are my 2 cents. use defaults for starters, dont go for the installing in som/weird/place/, have one version of ruby and one set of gems, like this you are less likely to run into these problems. On Mar 17, 4:47 pm, Greg Donald <gdon...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> 2009/3/17 "Wolas!" <jcpen...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>: > > > When you followed gregs advice you ended up sort of "fooling" the ruby > > command. now you have two of everything (2 rails gems, one under 1.8 > > and one under 1.9). > > There''s no such thing as a "ruby command" (at least not in my shell). > There is a ruby binary, and there''s a path that might find it > depending on where you put it and what directories your path contains. > Being able to change the path so it can find a different ruby binary > other than the one that came with the system is a feature of the > system, seriously.. no fooling. You can have your entire ruby > toolchain living out of /some/place/weird while completely ignoring > the ruby that came with the system, you only have to adjust the paths > to include the weird place. That''s how it works, it''s not magic, no > fooling. > > > make sure you are calling the correct gem from the correct place. If i > > were you, i would uninstall one of your ruby instalations (at this > > point 1.8) > > That''s all together not necessary. I suspect all of my development > systems have two ruby installs. I ignore the one that came with the > system and install my own whereever I want. I update my bashrc so it > knows about my intentions and that''s about it. > > -- > Greg Donaldhttp://destiney.com/--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Frederick Cheung
2009-Mar-20 09:50 UTC
Re: installed ruby ver 1.9 but not working with rails 2.3.2
On Mar 17, 3:47 pm, Greg Donald <gdon...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> 2009/3/17 "Wolas!" <jcpen...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>: > > > make sure you are calling the correct gem from the correct place. If i > > were you, i would uninstall one of your ruby instalations (at this > > point 1.8) > > That''s all together not necessary. I suspect all of my development > systems have two ruby installs. I ignore the one that came with the > system and install my own whereever I want. I update my bashrc so it > knows about my intentions and that''s about it.The problem here is that''s not what happened. Rather than using bashrc etc.. to put one install of ruby ahead of the other, ruby1.9 was renamed to ruby without gem1.9 being renamed to gem (and similarly for all other ruby related binaries (eg irb)) Fred> > -- > Greg Donaldhttp://destiney.com/--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---