It was said at one time that Rails 1.1 might be released in February. Is that still likely? Thanks, Don Mc -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Well, since tomorrow is the last day of February, I wouldn''t hold my breath. However, there has been a flurry of activity on the core mailing list this weekend. Rails 1.1 draweth neigh... -Derrick Spell On Feb 27, 2006, at 9:17 AM, don mc wrote:> It was said at one time that Rails 1.1 might be released in > February. Is > that still likely? > > Thanks, > Don Mc > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >
> Rails 1.1 draweth neigh...Is there by any chance some document available summarizing all the (major) beautiful new stuff in Rails 1.1? -- http://www.mans.de
On 2/27/06, Hendrik Mans <hendrik@mans.de> wrote:> > Rails 1.1 draweth neigh... > > Is there by any chance some document available summarizing all the > (major) beautiful new stuff in Rails 1.1?svn diff http://dev.rubyonrails.org/svn/rails/trunk http://dev.rubyonrails.org/svn/rails/tags/rel_1-0-0/ :-)
> > Is there by any chance some document available summarizing all the > > (major) beautiful new stuff in Rails 1.1? > > svn diff http://dev.rubyonrails.org/svn/rails/trunk > http://dev.rubyonrails.org/svn/rails/tags/rel_1-0-0/My question originally used the word "listing", but I replaced it with "summarizing" because I expected that kind of reply. Thanks for not disappointing. So I take it the answer is "no"? -- http://www.mans.de
Here is an approximately 75% less annoying answer for you. The individual rails "components" have ChangeLogs that describe what has changed since the last "official" release. You can have a look online at: http://dev.rubyonrails.com/svn/rails/trunk/actionmailer/CHANGELOG http://dev.rubyonrails.com/svn/rails/trunk/actionpack/CHANGELOG http://dev.rubyonrails.com/svn/rails/trunk/actionwebservice/CHANGELOG http://dev.rubyonrails.com/svn/rails/trunk/activerecord/CHANGELOG http://dev.rubyonrails.com/svn/rails/trunk/railties/CHANGELOG It might be a fun project to write some code to parse these files including everything above a line that doesn''t have * (date of some kind) * and merge them into a single file for consumption, or maybe that is the kind of fun only a masochist programmer would enjoy :-) -Steve http://www.stevelongdo.com On 2/27/06, Hendrik Mans <hendrik@mans.de> wrote:> > > > Is there by any chance some document available summarizing all the > > > (major) beautiful new stuff in Rails 1.1? > > > > svn diff http://dev.rubyonrails.org/svn/rails/trunk > > http://dev.rubyonrails.org/svn/rails/tags/rel_1-0-0/ > > My question originally used the word "listing", but I replaced it with > "summarizing" because I expected that kind of reply. Thanks for not > disappointing. > > So I take it the answer is "no"? > > -- > http://www.mans.de > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060227/ff625f42/attachment.html
> The individual rails "components" have ChangeLogs that describe what has > changed since the last "official" release. You can have a look online at:I''m aware of the availability of full changelogs. I did actually use the word "summary" on purpose. I''ve already understood that the answer to my question is "no". Since I actually waded through the changelogs earlier, maybe I''ll write something up tomorrow. The naive little Rails lubber in me was hoping that someone more familiar with 1.1 had already prepared something similar. -- http://www.mans.de
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Feb 27, 2006, at 12:19 PM, Hendrik Mans wrote:> I''ve already understood that the answer to my question is "no". Since > I actually waded through the changelogs earlier, maybe I''ll write > something up tomorrow. The naive little Rails lubber in me was hoping > that someone more familiar with 1.1 had already prepared something > similar.Hendrik, you may count on a "New in 1.1" update along with its release. jeremy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (Darwin) iD8DBQFEA2LkAQHALep9HFYRAlMBAJ93jup8mcn/GOpR0xH/TCnrTfRH1QCg0rlb WIPQrlY9yfl47xb6eWP0qSY=ubzT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Hendrik, you may count on a "New in 1.1" update along with its release.I know. I was hoping for kind of a preview, since I know there are people out there who''ve been working with HEAD and are somewhat up-to-date on what awaits us in 1.1. -- http://www.mans.de
I know that no one knows the date, but does anyone know if we''re getting close to a release?> Hendrik, you may count on a "New in 1.1" update along with its release. >Charlie Bowman recentrambles.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060227/acfd5885/attachment.html
On Feb 27, 2006, at 3:50 PM, Hendrik Mans wrote:>> Hendrik, you may count on a "New in 1.1" update along with its >> release. > > I know. I was hoping for kind of a preview, since I know there are > people out there who''ve been working with HEAD and are somewhat > up-to-date on what awaits us in 1.1. >Well, I''m not a guru by any stretch, but I know that at least as far as active record is concerned two big things are polymorphic associations and the :through option on associations. I''m pretty sure that both of these features are explained in the wiki. You may want to have a pre-release look :) -Derrick Spell
On Feb 27, 2006, at 3:57 PM, Charlie Bowman wrote:> I know that no one knows the date, but does anyone know if we''re > getting close to a release? >Yes, we are... but you''re right, no man knows the day nor the hour ... -Derrick Spell
Hendrik Mans wrote:> I was hoping for kind of a preview, since I know there are > people out there who''ve been working with HEAD and are somewhat > up-to-date on what awaits us in 1.1.Here''s the preview you''re looking for: http://scottraymond.net/articles/2006/02/28/rails-1.1 It''s not every last change, but it''s all of those that I considered interesting. Best- :sco
On Feb 27, 2006, at 7:08 PM, Scott Raymond wrote:> Hendrik Mans wrote: >> I was hoping for kind of a preview, since I know there are >> people out there who''ve been working with HEAD and are somewhat >> up-to-date on what awaits us in 1.1. > > Here''s the preview you''re looking for: > > http://scottraymond.net/articles/2006/02/28/rails-1.1 > > It''s not every last change, but it''s all of those that I considered > interesting.Thanks, Scott. -- -- Tom Mornini
Scott Raymond wrote:>>I was hoping for kind of a preview, since I know there are >>people out there who''ve been working with HEAD and are somewhat >>up-to-date on what awaits us in 1.1. > > Here''s the preview you''re looking for: > > http://scottraymond.net/articles/2006/02/28/rails-1.1 > > It''s not every last change, but it''s all of those that I considered interesting.Apologies for contributing to the meandering thread but I''ve been meaning to ask this: what is "Railties"? Is that "rail ties" as in the things that support the rails... the basic build blocks? b
Yes, "railties" is sort of the deep-down glue that supports the "rails". Looks to me like mostly configuration and low-level infrastructure. That''s been my guess though I''m not totally sure. And now that I''ve actually made the guess out loud, no doubt someone else will point out that I''m quite wrong :-) But seriously... that''s what I''ve surmised as well. Jeff www.softiesonrails.com On Monday, February 27, 2006, at 7:48 PM, Ben Munat wrote:>Scott Raymond wrote: >>>I was hoping for kind of a preview, since I know there are >>>people out there who''ve been working with HEAD and are somewhat >>>up-to-date on what awaits us in 1.1. >> >> Here''s the preview you''re looking for: >> >> http://scottraymond.net/articles/2006/02/28/rails-1.1 >> >> It''s not every last change, but it''s all of those that I >>considered interesting. > >Apologies for contributing to the meandering thread but I''ve been >meaning to ask this: >what is "Railties"? Is that "rail ties" as in the things that >support the rails... the >basic build blocks? > >b > >_______________________________________________ >Rails mailing list >Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org >http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-- Posted with http://DevLists.com. Sign up and save your time!
> Here''s the preview you''re looking for: > > http://scottraymond.net/articles/2006/02/28/rails-1.1 > > It''s not every last change, but it''s all of those that I considered interesting.Awesome, thank you very much. :) -- http://www.mans.de