[Rails] Re: Routes working with subdirectories repeat subdirectory...

Rabbit
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 07:02:22 -0000

That''s interesting. If I get rid of the routing rule, standard
link_to''s
work fine. I know this will come back to haunt me though. =/

- Rabbit

---

On 1/24/06, Rabbit <rabbitblue@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> Views associated with admin controllers must always specify both
> :controller and :action when using link_to.
>
> Example:
>
> <%= link_to ''Edit'', { :controller =>
''/raid_manager'', :action =>
> ''edit_raid_template'', :id => raid_template.id } %>
>
> The above is being called from within the Admin::RaidManagerController.
> The controller was generated by using the Rails generate script, with a
> filename argument of "admin/RaidManager". Whenever I use that
format, it
> prepends Admin:: to my class name - why? I know :: is the scope resolution
> operator, but there''s scarce documentation about, even in the pick
axe book.
> (That''s more of an aside question.)
>
> If I use link_to without specifying the controller, the link itself works,
> but then I get something like:
>
> xyz.com/admin/admin/raid_manager/edit_raid_template
>
> It repeats the admin part. I also get the same effect even if I DO include
> the controller without the preceeeding /.
>
> The routes that handle the admin area looks like:
>
> map.connect ''/admin/'', :controller =>
''admin/news_manager''
> map.connect ''/admin/:controller/:action/:id''
>
> I don''t like having to continually reference the controller, and I
feel
> like I shouldn''t have to. Also, I''ve found I''m
unable to break out of the
> admin/... URL once I''m in it.So like if I were to log out, and
redirect
> someone to :controller => ''pages'', it would still look
like admin/pages.
> ARGH!
>
> - Rabbit
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...