Re: OT: Looking for a lightweight ruby framework

Ramin
Fri, 25 Mar 2005 20:58:10 -0000

No matter what Ruby framework you may find, I doubt any of them would
run w/o shell access and proper installation. After all, any Ruby
framework needs "Ruby" to work. So if you can''t get Ruby
installed and
working by itself on your host, then there is no point in looking for
a framework.


On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 22:52:03 +0100, Norman Timmler
<norman-QkIQCVqxERM@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > Has anyone expirience to install RoR on a shared hosting server,
with
> > > only ftp access? I believe that''s not possible,
isn''t it? Or do you know
> > > another more lightweight ruby framework? Any ideas?
> >
> > I don''t think it would be possible with only ftp since you
have to
> > actually install stuff, it''s not enough to simply copy files.
>
> You can install rails without shell access, as i tried today. I know
> this is not the normal way, but it works. The main problem now is, that
> the provider has not all necessary ruby modules installed. I now cancel
> this experiment.
>
> So, once again: Does anyone have an idea of a lightweight Ruby
> framework?
>
> --
> Norman Timmler
> Holländische Reihe 31
> 22765 Hamburg
>
> +49 (0)40 / 43 25 10 80
>
> mailto:norman-QkIQCVqxERM@public.gmane.org
>
>                        _
> ASCII ribbon campaign ( )
>  - against HTML email  X
>              & vCards / \
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rails mailing list
> Rails-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org
> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>


--
- Ramin