Re: Confusing dependencies

matthewrudyjacobs@gmail.com
Fri, 01 Aug 2008 08:30:17 -0000

http://gist.github.com/3594

On Aug 1, 9:30 am, "matthewrudyjac...@gmail.com"
<matthewrudyjac...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I just tried it with 2.1.0
>
> uncommented the line;
> config.frameworks -> [ :active_record, :active_resource, :action_mailer
]
>
> and nothing works unfortunately.
>
> I imagine it does work sometimes,
> but given there''s no test on the functionality...
>
> On Jul 31, 10:47 am, Frederick Cheung <frederick.che...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On 26 Jul 2008, at 11:24, Michael Koziarski wrote:
>
> > >> Now I wondered if these depenencies are intended (to keep
complexety
> > >> as low as possible), and -- if not --, whether
there''re plans for
> > >> rather autonomous frameworks.
>
> > > We certainly expect you to be able to turn off the frameworks
where
> > > that makes sense.  If it''s as simple as a few missing
requires for
> > > things like erb then we can definitely take patches to fix that.
>
> > > Making them completely autonomous isn''t a high priority
goal for most
> > > people, but there''s no reason to make it impossible to
turn AR off for
> > > example.
>
> > This does work (or at least used to), I''ve got a 2.0.2 app
around
> > somewhere that doesn''t use ActiveRecord (and it was as simple
as using
> > config.frameworks)
>
> > Fred