Re: Confusing dependencies

Michael Koziarski
Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:52:00 -0000

Thats because you have active record mentioned in one of the initializers:

  from /Users/matthew/code/nodb/config/initializers/new_rails_defaults.rb:5

Just comment it out / remove it from there.

On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 10:30 AM, matthewrudyjacobs@gmail.com
<matthewrudyjacobs@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> http://gist.github.com/3594
>
> On Aug 1, 9:30 am, "matthewrudyjac...@gmail.com"
> <matthewrudyjac...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I just tried it with 2.1.0
>>
>> uncommented the line;
>> config.frameworks ->> [ :active_record, :active_resource,
:action_mailer ]
>>
>> and nothing works unfortunately.
>>
>> I imagine it does work sometimes,
>> but given there''s no test on the functionality...
>>
>> On Jul 31, 10:47 am, Frederick Cheung
<frederick.che...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > On 26 Jul 2008, at 11:24, Michael Koziarski wrote:
>>
>> > >> Now I wondered if these depenencies are intended (to keep
complexety
>> > >> as low as possible), and -- if not --, whether
there''re plans for
>> > >> rather autonomous frameworks.
>>
>> > > We certainly expect you to be able to turn off the frameworks
where
>> > > that makes sense.  If it''s as simple as a few
missing requires for
>> > > things like erb then we can definitely take patches to fix
that.
>>
>> > > Making them completely autonomous isn''t a high
priority goal for most
>> > > people, but there''s no reason to make it impossible
to turn AR off for
>> > > example.
>>
>> > This does work (or at least used to), I''ve got a 2.0.2
app around
>> > somewhere that doesn''t use ActiveRecord (and it was as
simple as using
>> > config.frameworks)
>>
>> > Fred
> >
>



--
Cheers

Koz