Re: Confusing dependencies

matthewrudyjacobs@gmail.com
Fri, 01 Aug 2008 08:30:03 -0000

I just tried it with 2.1.0

uncommented the line;
config.frameworks -[ :active_record, :active_resource, :action_mailer ]

and nothing works unfortunately.

I imagine it does work sometimes,
but given there''s no test on the functionality...

On Jul 31, 10:47 am, Frederick Cheung <frederick.che...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On 26 Jul 2008, at 11:24, Michael Koziarski wrote:
>
>
>
> >> Now I wondered if these depenencies are intended (to keep
complexety
> >> as low as possible), and -- if not --, whether there''re
plans for
> >> rather autonomous frameworks.
>
> > We certainly expect you to be able to turn off the frameworks where
> > that makes sense.  If it''s as simple as a few missing
requires for
> > things like erb then we can definitely take patches to fix that.
>
> > Making them completely autonomous isn''t a high priority goal
for most
> > people, but there''s no reason to make it impossible to turn
AR off for
> > example.
>
> This does work (or at least used to), I''ve got a 2.0.2 app around

> somewhere that doesn''t use ActiveRecord (and it was as simple as
using
> config.frameworks)
>
> Fred