Re: plugin dependencies

Andrew Kaspick
Wed, 19 Sep 2007 19:46:47 -0000

Except there is no real concept of versions with plugins.  Starting
with simple dependency requirements of "plugin X requires plugin Y"
would make me happy for now.

On 9/19/07, Pratik <pratiknaik@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I didn''t intend my post to be a personal attack, and
I''m sorry that it made
> > you feel attacked.  I didn''t make any statements about your
person; it''s
> > your position that I questioned.
> >
>
> Point taken. No worries :) Thanks for clearing the air.
>
> >
> > Sorry for the novel.  Executive summary: These aren''t new
problems.  Let''s
> > learn from at old solutions.
>
> Exactly. That''s why plugins as gems approach is better, as you can
> have versioning of your plugins and any other plugin can easily say "I
> need version X of plugingem Foo" even though the latest version of Foo
> is X+2.
> --
> Cheers!
> - Pratik
> http://m.onkey.org
>
> >