R help - Oct 2001 - zeros in table() output in version 1.3.1

Are the following differences in table() output
between versions 1.3.0 and 1.3.1 a feature, a bug
or a problem with my implementation?

(I am running under Solaris 2.7 SPARC, built using the
Sun C and FORTRAN compilers.)

Version 1.3.1:
> table(c(0,1),c(0,1))
   
    1
  1 1

Version 1.3.0:
 
> table(c(0,1),c(0,1))
   
    0 1
  0 1 0
  1 0 1


-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-help-request at
stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._

Steve Shiboski <steve at biostat.ucsf.edu> writes:
> Are the following differences in table() output
> between versions 1.3.0 and 1.3.1 a feature, a bug
> or a problem with my implementation?
> 
> (I am running under Solaris 2.7 SPARC, built using the
> Sun C and FORTRAN compilers.)
> 
> Version 1.3.1:
> 
> > table(c(0,1),c(0,1))
>    
>     1
>   1 1
That'll be a bug, but it is not there when R is built with GNU tools:
> table(c(0,1),c(0,1))
   
    0 1
  0 1 0
  1 0 1
> version
         _                   
platform sparc-sun-solaris2.7
arch     sparc               
os       solaris2.7          
system   sparc, solaris2.7   
status                       
major    1                   
minor    3.1                 
year     2001                
month    08                  
day      31                  
language R                   


-- 
   O__  ---- Peter Dalgaard             Blegdamsvej 3  
  c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics     2200 Cph. N   
 (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen   Denmark      Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk)             FAX: (+45) 35327907
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-help-request at
stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._

Steve Shiboski <steve at biostat.ucsf.edu> writes:
>Are the following differences in table() output
>between versions 1.3.0 and 1.3.1 a feature, a bug
>or a problem with my implementation?
>
>(I am running under Solaris 2.7 SPARC, built using the
>Sun C and FORTRAN compilers.)
>
>Version 1.3.1:
>
>> table(c(0,1),c(0,1))
>   
>    1
>  1 1
>
>Version 1.3.0:
> 
>> table(c(0,1),c(0,1))
>   
>    0 1
>  0 1 0
>  1 0 1
Odd. I don't get this behaviour on my Windows box. I think that,
perhaps, it is down to how the binary was compiled. Did you use the Sun
tools or the GNU tools?

Mark


--
Mark Myatt


-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-help-request at
stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._