Re: [Puppet Users] BigIP and Puppet

Jeff Gutierrez
Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:16:24 -0000

We''re not that concerned with warranty as being able to recover from
device
failure (even with a backup instance) quickly is the primary motivation.

The other option I''m thinking of is pushing the rules from Jenkins to
the
BigIP instances, but I''d rather have the puppet agent impose the rules
instead of an implicit and manual trigger (someone clicking the
"build"
button.)

On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Christopher Wood <
christopher_wood@pobox.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:05:02PM -0800, Jeff Gutierrez wrote:
> > Has anyone successfully puppetized BigIP (F5)?
> >
> > I''m specifically trying to figure out a path in making our
BigIP
> > instances be under puppet so all the VIPs, pools, profiles, etc. are
> > all under puppet control. My requirements are probably going to be
> > fulfilled even with just uploading a rules file if a delta''s
detected.
> > The main issue I have now is figuring out when to reload the rules
> > without doing it every time the puppet agent executes.
> >
> > I''d appreciate any information.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jeff
>
> What did F5 say about whether this voids your warranty?
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Puppet Users" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
> >
> >
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Puppet Users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
>
>