Hello. Which kernel could be used for dom0 together with just-uploaded xen hypervisor 3.2 ? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/attachments/20080123/64b16f1f/attachment.pgp
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 11:59:27PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:> Hello. > > Which kernel could be used for dom0 together with just-uploaded xen > hypervisor 3.2 ?I think 2.6.18-5-xen kernel is a pretty safe choise.. official xen 3.2.0 is based on 2.6.18 kernel anyway (xensource has not updated xen patches for later kernels). There has been a lot of problems with the 2.6.2x xen kernels.. Redhat is working at the moment to finish the xen support in 2.6.2x kernels and they're going to submit the required patches (for dom0 and x86-64 support etc) to vanilla/linus kernel. This work will be included in Fedora 9. -- Pasi
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 11:59:27PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: > > Hello. > > > > Which kernel could be used for dom0 together with just-uploaded xen > > hypervisor 3.2 ? > > I think 2.6.18-5-xen kernel is a pretty safe choise.. official xen 3.2.0 > is based on 2.6.18 kernel anyway (xensource has not updated xen patches > for later kernels).I've read somewhere that 2.6.18-5-xen kernel from etch is not compatible with xen 3-1, and won't boot with it. Is that true? What about xen 3.2 ? I'm currently running several xen-based servers, and there are some issues with those. I would like to check if situation is better with later xen releases.
Reasonably Related Threads
- Re: Bug#390862: -bigmem version of xen kernels is really needed
- Wine and cyrillic input and output ?
- Big machines support by Debian Xen
- Still un-answered: How-To build Xen (3.2) to override XenSource''s linux-kernel (2.6.18) with a xenified kernel (your own or distribution)
- xen 3.2 release build broken?