[llvm-dev] Removing LLVM_ALWAYS_INLINE from ADT classes

via llvm-dev
2019-01-07T16:33:02Z

IIRC the issues with defaulting to –DLLVM_OPTIMIZE_TABLEGEN=ON came up in two
places:
First, if it's not a Debug build, this actually slows down the build. The
defaulting has to be for Debug config only.  This is arguably bad UI, because it
makes the default modal, but there's a clear benefit in build time so I
think we can live with that.
Second, if it's a multi-config builder (e.g. MSBuild) then it gets a little
weird, I don't remember exactly how.
--paulr

From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Mehdi
AMINI via llvm-dev
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2019 7:42 PM
To: Paweł Bylica; Chris Bieneman
Cc: LLVM Dev
Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Removing LLVM_ALWAYS_INLINE from ADT classes



On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 3:52 PM Paweł Bylica via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at
lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 12:38 AM Duncan P. N. Exon Smith via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>>
wrote:
This makes sense to me.

One concern is that this in itself will slow down the build, since tablegen will
get even slower.  Ideally, there would be some (perhaps default?) configuration
where we build the tablegen binaries with optimizations on and then use them in
the build, as if we were cross-compiling.

Maybe something simple like -DLLVM_OPTIMIZE_TABLEGEN=ON (enabled by default for
Debug builds). You would need to set it to off only if you want to debug
tablegen.

I proposed this a while back, but it think there were some problems with it, I
don't remember what exactly but maybe related to bootstrapping / 2-stages
builds?

+ Chris, maybe he remembers something?

--
Mehdi





> On Jan 4, 2019, at 15:14, Davide Italiano via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at
lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I would like to propose, based on a previous discussion on llvm-dev,
> the following change.
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D56337
>
> The main motivation for annotating member functions of ADT clases with
> LLVM_ALWAYS_INLINE  was that of speeding up `check-llvm` at `-O0`.
> Turns out this significantly degrades the debuggability of fundamental
> classes in llvm itself, e.g. StringRef or SmallVector.
>
> After discussing we agreed that it's reasonable to drop
> LLVM_ALWYAS_INLINE from ADT classes  member functions and add a note
> in the developer's manual.
>
> If you have any feedbacks or concerns, please speak up.
> If nothing major arises, I'm going to commit this patch in a week (or
such).
>
> Thanks for your time,
>
> --
> Davide
>
> "There are no solved problems; there are only problems that are more
> or less solved" -- Henri Poincare
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev

_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190107/eba03fea/attachment.html>