[llvm-dev] [RFC] One or many git repositories?

Renato Golin via llvm-dev
2016-07-26T09:15:03Z

On 26 July 2016 at 10:09, Simon Taylor via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Thus downstream developers can continue to use the read-only view of the
independent projects if that is easier for them; but people hacking on
llvm/clang itself get the benefits of easier checkout, patching, bisection,
atomic commits between projects, etc that come from using a monorepo as the
official repository.

Would this read-only repositories remain with the synchronous version
stream? I think this was one of the points against pure-git without
sub-modules and without monolithic repository.

cheers,
--renato