[llvm-dev] The Trouble with Triples

Daniel Sanders via llvm-dev
Thu, 24 Sep 2015 14:35:26 -0000

> > I wouldn’t impose autoconf on anyone who has escaped it. As long as we
have a route
> > to push this information into a build that is fine. Several CMAKE
variables would do the
> > same thing. That change seems like a no-brainer and could potentially
be done in parallel
> > to fixing how the information then goes on to flow through LLVM. (If
autoconf based
> > builds are still alive in LLVM I could try and coach someone through
how to do this in
> > autoconf but if it is dying in LLVM then let’s not feed it.)
> I can also coach them through. But yes, this is exactly what should happen.
If we want to support autoconf then I'll need some help. Personally, I'd
prefer to ignore it and just do cmake.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150924/61b5c76c/attachment.html>