[LLVMdev] Do we still need LLVM_HAS_INITIALIZER_LISTS?

David Majnemer
Tue, 17 Feb 2015 03:30:20 -0000

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com>
wrote:

> Currently, LLVM_HAS_INITIALIZER_LISTS is set based on
>
>   __has_feature(cxx_generalized_initializers) && !defined(_MSC_VER)
>
> Based on the docs, we should be able to drop the _MSC_VER check now that
> we've moved to VS2013. Can somebody confirm that?
>
>
MSDN claims that VS2013 supports braced initializer list syntax:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn387583.aspx


> The other problem is that GCC doesn't recognize __has_feature, so this
> is essentially only enabled for clang. If we're keeping this check it
> should really check the GCC version as well - they've had these for
> quite a while now.
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150216/6135e8b4/attachment.html>