[LLVMdev] [RFC] Progress report on CMake build system's ability to replace autoconf

Joerg Sonnenberger
Tue, 17 Feb 2015 20:21:15 -0000

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 09:03:11AM +0000, Zachary Turner
wrote:
> +Ed Maste, who maintains FreeBSD's LLDB and probably does not check
this
> very often.  I know (or at least am pretty sure) that they are using
> autoconf over there, so he may be aware of other issues.

Just for the record, as far as NetBSD is concerned, LLDB without
autoconf is a non-issue. autoconf is only relevant for the
bootstrapping, so code outside llvm, clang and maybe lld is perfectly
acceptable as cmake-only.

Joerg