[LLVMdev] RFC: Missing canonicalization in LLVM

Chandler Carruth
Wed, 21 Jan 2015 23:33:30 -0000

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Smith, Kevin B <kevin.b.smith at
intel.com>
wrote:

> I don’t think these are equivalent representations.  The one with the
> float loads and stores has the potential of FP exceptions
>
> both during the load and during the store
>

LLVM explicitly doesn't support FP exceptions on loads and stores. And it
would break the world to add it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150121/6d480f78/attachment.html>