[LLVMdev] Proposal for ""llvm.mem.vectorize.safelen"

Renato Golin
Wed, 20 Aug 2014 16:00:07 -0000

On 20 August 2014 16:17, Robison, Arch <arch.robison at intel.com>
wrote:
> But safelen is different.  It's an assertion about safety, so prefixing
it with
> llvm.loop.vectorize seems inappropriate.  Does is sound reasonable to drop
> the "vectorize" portion.  Maybe spell it something like this?

This was true to all *current* vectorizer pragmas, but certainly not
safelen. I think we can change that description instead of changing
the namespace.

cheers,
--renato