[LLVMdev] LLVM commit 410f38e01597120b41e406ec1cea69127463f9e5

Matt Arsenault
Tue, 08 Jul 2014 23:26:02 -0000

On 07/08/2014 03:20 PM, Matt Arsenault wrote:
> Alternatively maybe this should only be done if the setcc type is the
> same as the sext result?
I think we should actually do this. If you need to convert the setcc
result after, you aren't really gaining anything by doing this
transformation
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140708/37084110/attachment.html>