[LLVMdev] Contributing new backend to LLVM

Török Edwin
Tue, 01 Nov 2011 19:22:39 -0000

On 11/01/2011 09:16 PM, Sergei Larin wrote:
> Eli,
>
>   We can probably think of something like that, but diff on assembly output
> is prone to false negatives and depends on the machine independent part of
> the compiler...
> Maybe someone can suggest more elegant way to verify the basic
> functionality?

Maybe tests like test/CodeGen/X86/fast-isel-call.ll, fast-isel-mem.ll, etc.
i.e. very few LLVM IR instructions, each in its own function, and using
CHECK:/CHECK-NEXT

Best regards,
--Edwin