[LLVMdev] Contributing new backend to LLVM

Sergei Larin
Tue, 01 Nov 2011 21:36:24 -0000

Sorry if it sounded like I have questioned the need for these tests - rather
I am trying to gather as much info up-front as I can.
Maybe that's why some sort of FAQ for backend submission (as Tony pointed)
is not such a bad idea :)

Thanks everyone for quick responses. Point is taken.

Sergei Larin

--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum.


-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Christopher [mailto:echristo at apple.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 2:22 PM
To: Sergei Larin
Cc: 'Eli Friedman'; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Contributing new backend to LLVM


On Nov 1, 2011, at 12:16 PM, Sergei Larin wrote:

> Eli,
>
>  We can probably think of something like that, but diff on assembly output
> is prone to false negatives and depends on the machine independent part of
> the compiler...

Please look at how all of the existing tests in test/CodeGen/<Target> work
before rejecting the suggestion.

-eric