[LLVMdev] CVS Branches To Discard?

Reid Spencer
Mon, 02 Apr 2007 19:01:23 -0000

On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 13:30 -0500, Vikram S. Adve wrote:
> Reed,
>
> Can the "see" branch be renamed "SVA", for Secure
Virtual
> Architecture?  This is the new name of the LLVA system and project.
> It uses LLVM as the instruction set and compiler infrastructure.

Yes, we can do that. I'll add it to the conversion script.


>
> Thanks,
>
> --Vikram
> http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/~vadve
> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/
>
>
> On Apr 2, 2007, at 1:08 PM, Reid Spencer wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > We are considering removing some branches and tags in the conversion
> > process from CVS to SVN. We don't want to do this in a vaccuum, so
> > please read carefully.
> >
> > A deficiency in the cvs2svn script causes it to bloat the Subversion
> > repository (significantly, as in 10x) in the conversion of branches
> > and
> > tags. We can minimize the impact of this by only keeping branches and
> > tags that we really need. This gives us an opportunity to clean up
> > some
> > "dead wood" too. Obviously, I don't want to do this
without your
> > feedback (loosing your needed branch/tag would be bad).
> >
> > So, please consult the SVN Migration page,
> > http://llvm.org/SVNMigration.html. This lists the branches and tags we
> > have currently and whether they are scheduled for deletion or
> > inclusion.
> > If you think I've categorized something incorrectly, please let me
> > know
> > ASAP!
> >
> > We'd like to get this finalized over the next few days.
> >
> > Thanks in advance for your help,
> >
> > Reid.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LLVM Developers mailing list
> > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev