[PATCH v2 4/6] virtio: Initialize authorized attribute for confidential guest

Alan Stern
Fri, 01 Oct 2021 19:00:48 -0000

On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 11:09:52AM -0700, Dan Williams
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 9:47 AM Alan Stern <stern at
rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 09:13:54AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > Bear with me, and perhaps it's a lack of imagination on my
part, but I
> > > don't see how to get to a globally generic
"authorized" sysfs ABI
> > > given that USB and Thunderbolt want to do bus specific actions on
> > > authorization toggle events. Certainly a default generic
authorized
> > > attribute can be defined for all the other buses that don't
have
> > > legacy here, but Thunderbolt will still require support for
'2' as an
> > > authorized value, and USB will still want to base probe decisions
on
> > > the authorization state of both the usb_device and the
usb_interface.
> >
> > The USB part isn't really accurate (I can't speak for
Thunderbolt).
> > When a usb_device is deauthorized, the device will be unconfigured,
> > deleting all its interfaces and removing the need for any probe
> > decisions about them.  In other words, the probe decision for a
> > usb_device or usb_interface depends only on the
device's/interface's
> > own authorization state.
> >
> > True, the interface binding code does contain a test of the
device's
> > authorization setting.  That test is redundant and can be removed.
> >
> > The actions that USB wants to take on authorization toggle events for
> > usb_devices are: for authorize, select and install a configuration;
> > for deauthorize, unconfigure the device.  Each of these could be
> > handled simply enough just by binding/unbinding the device.  (There
> > is some special code for handling wireless USB devices, but wireless
> > USB is now defunct.)
>
> Ah, so are you saying that it would be sufficient for USB if the
> generic authorized implementation did something like:
>
> dev->authorized = 1;
> device_attach(dev);
>
> ...for the authorize case, and:
>
> dev->authorize = 0;
> device_release_driver(dev);
>
> ...for the deauthorize case?

Yes, I think so.  But I haven't tried making this change to test and
see what really happens.

Alan Stern