The error below happens with 0.16.5 and 0.16.3 but not 0.13. seanh at kisimul:$ ruby instiki => Booting WEBrick => Rails 2.3.2 application starting on http://0.0.0.0:2500 ./script/../config/../vendor/rails/railties/lib/initializer.rb:269:in `require_frameworks'': no such file to load -- net/https (RuntimeError) from ./script/../config/../vendor/rails/railties/lib/initializer.rb:134:in `process'' from ./script/../config/../vendor/rails/railties/lib/initializer.rb:113:in `send'' from ./script/../config/../vendor/rails/railties/lib/initializer.rb:113:in `run'' from /home/seanh/Desktop/instiki/config/environment.rb:14 from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in `gem_original_require'' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in `require'' from /home/seanh/Desktop/instiki/vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:156:in `require'' from /home/seanh/Desktop/instiki/vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:521:in `new_constants_in'' from /home/seanh/Desktop/instiki/vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:156:in `require'' from ./script/server:88 from instiki:6:in `load'' from instiki:6
On Mar 31, 2009, at 2:39 PM, tchomby wrote:> The error below happens with 0.16.5 and 0.16.3 but not 0.13. > > seanh at kisimul:$ ruby instiki > => Booting WEBrick > => Rails 2.3.2 application starting on http://0.0.0.0:2500 > ./script/../config/../vendor/rails/railties/lib/initializer.rb:269:in > `require_frameworks'': no such file to load -- net/https (RuntimeError) > from ./script/../config/../vendor/rails/railties/lib/initializer.rb: > 134:in > `process''Net/https is a standard Ruby package (required by Rails). It should have come with your Ruby installation. I gather that, on some (?) Ubuntu installations, you need to install the libopenssl-ruby1.8 package to get it: apt-get install libopenssl-ruby see, e.g.: http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/255066 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PGP.sig Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 253 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/instiki-users/attachments/20090331/3e50f111/attachment.bin>
Thanks, it works now. Instiki 0.16.5 seems really good. On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Jacques Distler < distler at golem.ph.utexas.edu> wrote:> > On Mar 31, 2009, at 2:39 PM, tchomby wrote: > > The error below happens with 0.16.5 and 0.16.3 but not 0.13. >> >> seanh at kisimul:$ ruby instiki >> => Booting WEBrick >> => Rails 2.3.2 application starting on http://0.0.0.0:2500 >> ./script/../config/../vendor/rails/railties/lib/initializer.rb:269:in >> `require_frameworks'': no such file to load -- net/https (RuntimeError) >> from >> ./script/../config/../vendor/rails/railties/lib/initializer.rb:134:in >> `process'' >> > > Net/https is a standard Ruby package (required by Rails). It should have > come with your Ruby installation. I gather that, on some (?) Ubuntu > installations, you need to install the libopenssl-ruby1.8 package to get it: > apt-get install libopenssl-ruby > > see, e.g.: > > http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/255066 >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/instiki-users/attachments/20090401/5390d824/attachment-0001.html>
On Apr 1, 2009, at 7:55 AM, tchomby wrote:> Thanks, it works now. Instiki 0.16.5 seems really good.Thanks for bringing the Ubuntu installation issue to my attention. I added> I gather that, on some (?) Ubuntu installations, you need to install > the libopenssl-ruby1.8 package to get it: > apt-get install libopenssl-rubyto the installation instructions http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/instiki/show/Installation Jacques -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PGP.sig Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 253 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/instiki-users/attachments/20090401/1db5285b/attachment.bin>
Matthias Tarasiewicz
2009-Apr-03 13:52 UTC
[Instiki] Instiki 0.16 does not work on Ubuntu 8.10
jaques: maybe we do a fallback to http if the libopenssl-ruby is not available? so people could still run instiki without https. do we know if there is only ubuntu with that issues or somebody on that list also had issues with debian? -m On Apr 1, 2009, at 5:08 PM, Jacques Distler wrote:> > On Apr 1, 2009, at 7:55 AM, tchomby wrote: > >> Thanks, it works now. Instiki 0.16.5 seems really good. > > Thanks for bringing the Ubuntu installation issue to my attention. > > I added > >> I gather that, on some (?) Ubuntu installations, you need to >> install the libopenssl-ruby1.8 package to get it: >> apt-get install libopenssl-ruby > > to the installation instructions > > http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/instiki/show/Installation > > Jacques > _______________________________________________ > Instiki-users mailing list > Instiki-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/instiki-users
On Apr 3, 2009, at 8:52 AM, Matthias Tarasiewicz wrote:> jaques: maybe we do a fallback to http if the libopenssl-ruby is not > available? so people could still run instiki without https. > > do we know if there is only ubuntu with that issues or somebody on > that list also had issues with debian?I don''t know which parts of Rails actually use net/https. But there are a BUNCH of other dependencies in Rails, on libopenssl, which will probably break if it''s not installed. I haven''t heard any complaints from Debian users, so I assume this is just an Ubuntu issue. This is not the only package that you need to install, in order to run Instiki on Ubuntu, so I don''t think adding it to the list of required packages is a big deal (and does no harm on Debian, for that matter). http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/instiki/show/Installation Jacques -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PGP.sig Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 253 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/instiki-users/attachments/20090403/9f1136cc/attachment.bin>
Matthias Tarasiewicz
2009-Apr-07 13:04 UTC
[Instiki-devel] [Instiki] Instiki 0.16 does not work on Ubuntu 8.10
just tried ruby/rails/instiki on debian testing (squeeze) besides the fact that debian seems to be a bad platform choice to run ruby (rubygems cannot be updated with gem''s internal gem update -- system command and is on version 1.2, which renders it unusable for rails 2.3.2) the same reported issue as on ubuntu just occured: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.3.2/lib/initializer.rb:269:in `require_frameworks'': no such file to load -- net/https (RuntimeError) so the issue affects debian and ubuntu. apt-get install libopenssl-ruby also did fix this issue. see this topic on the rubygems madness on debian: http://stakeventures.com/articles/2008/12/04/rubygem-is-from-mars-aptget-is-from-venus On Apr 4, 2009, at 12:16 AM, Jacques Distler wrote:> > On Apr 3, 2009, at 8:52 AM, Matthias Tarasiewicz wrote: > >> jaques: maybe we do a fallback to http if the libopenssl-ruby is >> not available? so people could still run instiki without https. >> >> do we know if there is only ubuntu with that issues or somebody on >> that list also had issues with debian? > > I don''t know which parts of Rails actually use net/https. But there > are a BUNCH of other dependencies in Rails, on libopenssl, which > will probably break if it''s not installed. > > I haven''t heard any complaints from Debian users, so I assume this > is just an Ubuntu issue. > > This is not the only package that you need to install, in order to > run Instiki on Ubuntu, so I don''t think adding it to the list of > required packages is a big deal (and does no harm on Debian, for > that matter). > > http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/instiki/show/Installation > > Jacques > _______________________________________________ > Instiki-users mailing list > Instiki-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/instiki-users
On Apr 7, 2009, at 8:04 AM, Matthias Tarasiewicz wrote:> just tried ruby/rails/instiki on debian testing (squeeze) > besides the fact that debian seems to be a bad platform choice to > run ruby (rubygems cannot be updated with gem''s internal gem update > --system command and is on version 1.2, which renders it unusable > for rails 2.3.2) the same reported issue as on ubuntu just occured: > > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.3.2/lib/initializer.rb:269:in > `require_frameworks'': no such file to load -- net/https (RuntimeError) > > so the issue affects debian and ubuntu. > > apt-get install libopenssl-ruby > also did fix this issue. > > see this topic on the rubygems madness on debian: > http://stakeventures.com/articles/2008/12/04/rubygem-is-from-mars-aptget-is-from-venusRight. I believe sudo apt-get install ruby ruby1.8-dev libopenssl-ruby rubygems swig libsqlite3-ruby1.8 flex bison gets you everything you need to install/run itex2MML and Instiki. In particular, you don''t need a GEM installation of Rails. On the other hand, to run the upgrade script http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/instiki/show/Upgrading does require rake, which probably does need to be installed via a GEM.>> This is not the only package that you need to install, in order to >> run Instiki on Ubuntu, so I don''t think adding it to the list of >> required packages is a big deal (and does no harm on Debian, for >> that matter). >> >> http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/instiki/show/InstallationJacques -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PGP.sig Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 253 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/instiki-users/attachments/20090407/139e6e71/attachment.bin>
Matthias Tarasiewicz
2009-Apr-07 22:45 UTC
[Instiki] Instiki 0.16 does not work on Ubuntu 8.10
> Right. > > I believe > > sudo apt-get install ruby ruby1.8-dev libopenssl-ruby rubygems > swig libsqlite3-ruby1.8 flex bison > > gets you everything you need to install/run itex2MML and Instiki.correct.> In particular, you don''t need a GEM installation of Rails.but rails 2.3.2 needs rubygems >= 1.3.1 at least that''s what it complained about on debian squeeze.> On the other hand, to run the upgrade script > > http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/instiki/show/Upgrading > > does require rake, which probably does need to be installed via a GEM.hmm. you are right. i would love to hear from other debian users if they experienced any problems or something similar that was described here. at least it does not only affect instiki, but all rails/rubygems software. -m
Matthias Tarasiewicz wrote:>> In particular, you don''t need a GEM installation of Rails. > > but rails 2.3.2 needs rubygems >= 1.3.1 > at least that''s what it complained about on debian squeeze. > >> On the other hand, to run the upgrade script >> >> http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/instiki/show/Upgrading >> >> does require rake, which probably does need to be installed via a GEM. > > hmm. you are right. > i would love to hear from other debian users if they experienced any > problems or something similar that was described here. at least it does > not only affect instiki, but all rails/rubygems software.While I don''t have a testing (squeeze) machine, I have machines running stable (lenny) and unstable (sid). Testing falls somewhere in between, but it shouldn''t differ very much from stable at the moment because lenny was just released a few weeks ago. I can verify that both machines are able to run the development version of Instiki with no problems and without installing anything via rubygems. Here are the relevant version numbers: stable: rails 2.1.0-6 rubygems 1.2.0-3 unstable: rails 2.2.2-1 rubygems 1.2.0-3 Jason -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/instiki-users/attachments/20090407/ae1c21b3/attachment.bin>
On Apr 7, 2009, at 6:25 PM, Jason Blevins wrote:> While I don''t have a testing (squeeze) machine, I have machines > running > stable (lenny) and unstable (sid). Testing falls somewhere in > between, > but it shouldn''t differ very much from stable at the moment because > lenny > was just released a few weeks ago. I can verify that both machines > are > able to run the development version of Instiki with no problems and > without > installing anything via rubygems. Here are the relevant version > numbers: > > stable: > rails 2.1.0-6 > rubygems 1.2.0-3 > > unstable: > rails 2.2.2-1 > rubygems 1.2.0-3Do you get a copy of rake, without installing via rubygems? If so, I withdraw the comment about the Instiki upgrade script. Jacques -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PGP.sig Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 253 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/instiki-users/attachments/20090407/05a5b1c2/attachment-0001.bin>
Jacques Distler wrote:> > On Apr 7, 2009, at 6:25 PM, Jason Blevins wrote: > >> While I don''t have a testing (squeeze) machine, I have machines >> running >> stable (lenny) and unstable (sid). Testing falls somewhere in >> between, >> but it shouldn''t differ very much from stable at the moment because >> lenny >> was just released a few weeks ago. I can verify that both machines >> are >> able to run the development version of Instiki with no problems and >> without >> installing anything via rubygems. Here are the relevant version >> numbers: >> >> stable: >> rails 2.1.0-6 >> rubygems 1.2.0-3 >> >> unstable: >> rails 2.2.2-1 >> rubygems 1.2.0-3 > > Do you get a copy of rake, without installing via rubygems? > > If so, I withdraw the comment about the Instiki upgrade script.Yes. I forgot to mention it, but Debian has a ''rake'' package as well. Jason -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/instiki-users/attachments/20090407/d9e525c2/attachment.bin>
Mag. Matthias Tarasiewicz
2009-Apr-10 09:23 UTC
[Instiki] Instiki 0.16 does not work on Ubuntu 8.10
> Yes. I forgot to mention it, but Debian has a ''rake'' package > as well.fyi, that was how i came to error messages: 1. apt-get install ruby-all 2. gem install rails 3. rails mynewproject 4. cd mynewproject 6. ruby script/server ---> error rails needs rubygems >= 1.3.1 to run. strange thing. i am glad that instiki seems not to be affected. i think this is because of the difference of gem rails vs. rails in a vendor directory. so this might affect people that run instiki with a global rails installation on debian or ubuntu. -m