Gluster users - Feb 2018 - new Gluster cluster: 3.10 vs 3.12

Hi

We are planning to install new gluster cluster and I am wondering which 
gluster LTM version will you suggest to install: 3.10 or 3.12 in terms 
of stability, performance and bugs free version. It will be used in a 
production environment and we do not plan to downtime it often - 
therefore, stability and performance are important for us.
Maybe my question is a little bit naive but in any software development 
we have more and less stable versions.
I see many complains about 3.12.x in this mailing list and it looks like 
3.12 has some serious issues. Is it correct?


Best regards,
Anatoliy

http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2018-February/033532.html

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 10:38 AM, Anatoliy Dmytriyev <tolid at
tolid.eu.org> wrote:
> Hi
>
> We are planning to install new gluster cluster and I am wondering which
> gluster LTM version will you suggest to install: 3.10 or 3.12 in terms of
> stability, performance and bugs free version. It will be used in a
> production environment and we do not plan to downtime it often - therefore,
> stability and performance are important for us.
> Maybe my question is a little bit naive but in any software development we
> have more and less stable versions.
> I see many complains about 3.12.x in this mailing list and it looks like
> 3.12 has some serious issues. Is it correct?
>
>
> Best regards,
> Anatoliy
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

After discussing with Xavi in #gluster-dev we found out that we could
eliminate the slow lstats by disabling disperse.eager-lock.
There is an open issue here :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546732
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20180226/77e194f8/attachment.html>